Onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — Area harvested, per in Latvia
Latvia: Onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — Area harvested, per was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — Area harvested, per in Latvia, 1995–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — area harvested, per in Latvia is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024. That is the lowest value across all 30 years on record.
That represents a change of down 15.5% on the previous year and down 76.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — area harvested, per in Latvia peaked at 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 1995 and was at its lowest, 0 ha per US$ of GDP, in 2024.
Latvia ranks 86th of 124 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — Area harvested, per in Latvia, year by year
| Year | ha per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1996 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -12.5% |
| 1997 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -51.9% |
| 1998 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -34.1% |
| 1999 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +2.3% |
| 2000 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +71.6% |
| 2001 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -33.0% |
| 2002 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +43.8% |
| 2003 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -12.3% |
| 2004 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -1.3% |
| 2005 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -30.0% |
| 2006 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -37.5% |
| 2007 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -34.3% |
| 2008 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -8.8% |
| 2009 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +50.5% |
| 2010 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -25.3% |
| 2011 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +1.1% |
| 2012 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -0.4% |
| 2013 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -31.0% |
| 2014 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +21.9% |
| 2015 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -8.2% |
| 2016 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -12.6% |
| 2017 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +25.4% |
| 2018 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -60.6% |
| 2019 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -25.7% |
| 2020 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +34.0% |
| 2021 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -12.6% |
| 2022 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +0.5% |
| 2023 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -18.3% |
| 2024 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -15.5% |
Latvia compared with similar countries
- Latvia's 0 ha per US$ of GDP is above the median for high income countries, which is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, 1.5× the median. (45 countries reporting)
- Latvia's 0 ha per US$ of GDP is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, 71% of the median. (41 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 5 |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
More agriculture & rural data for Latvia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 12.21 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0401 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,055 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.45 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3137 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 4.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 4.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 9.8% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 2.1% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — area harvested, per in Latvia?
- Onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — area harvested, per in Latvia was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — area harvested, per recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 1995.
- What is the lowest onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — area harvested, per recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024.
- How does Latvia rank for onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — area harvested, per?
- Latvia ranks 86th out of 124 countries with data for 2024.
- Is onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — area harvested, per rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 76.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 30 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — Area harvested ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.