Nuts and products — Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Nuts and products — Residuals was 44 1000 t in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
44 1000 t
Change on year
down 43.6%
Rank
1st
of 30 groups
All-time high
78 1000 t
in 2022
All-time low
-55 1000 t
in 2018
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Nuts and products — Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), 2010–2023

-500501002010201620232010: -8 1000 t2011: -13 1000 t2012: -41 1000 t2013: -21 1000 t2014: -20 1000 t2015: -30 1000 t2016: -24 1000 t2017: -28 1000 t2018: -55 1000 t2019: 43 1000 t2020: -36 1000 t2021: 65 1000 t2022: 78 1000 t2023: 44 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

In 2023, nuts and products — residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) stood at 44 1000 t.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 43.6% on the previous year and up 309.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, nuts and products — residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) peaked at 78 1000 t in 2022 and was at its lowest, -55 1000 t, in 2018.

That places Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) 1st out of 30 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Nuts and products — Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), year by year

Annual values for Nuts and products — Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), 2010 to 2023.
Year 1000 t Change
2010 -8 1000 t —
2011 -13 1000 t +62.5%
2012 -41 1000 t +215.4%
2013 -21 1000 t -48.8%
2014 -20 1000 t -4.8%
2015 -30 1000 t +50.0%
2016 -24 1000 t -20.0%
2017 -28 1000 t +16.7%
2018 -55 1000 t +96.4%
2019 43 1000 t -178.2%
2020 -36 1000 t -183.7%
2021 65 1000 t -280.6%
2022 78 1000 t +20.0%
2023 44 1000 t -43.6%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s -19.7 1000 t -55 1000 t 43 1000 t 10
2020s 37.75 1000 t -36 1000 t 78 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

  1. 1 Burkina Faso 112 1000 t compare
  2. 2 Uzbekistan 8 1000 t compare
  3. 3 Micronesia (Federated States of) 0 1000 t
  4. 3 Tuvalu 0 1000 t
  5. 3 Nauru 0 1000 t
  6. 3 Tonga 0 1000 t
  7. 3 Marshall Islands 0 1000 t
  8. 3 Bhutan 0 1000 t
  9. 3 Bahrain 0 1000 t
  10. 3 Democratic People's Republic of Korea 0 1000 t compare
  11. 3 Cuba 0 1000 t
  12. 3 Kiribati 0 1000 t
  13. 3 Turkmenistan 0 1000 t
  14. 3 Sao Tome and Principe 0 1000 t
  15. 3 Comoros 0 1000 t
  16. 3 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 t
  17. 3 Solomon Islands 0 1000 t
  18. 3 China, Macao SAR 0 1000 t
  19. 3 Tajikistan 0 1000 t compare
  20. 3 Vanuatu 0 1000 t
  21. 3 Libya 0 1000 t
  22. 3 Micronesia 0 1000 t
  23. 3 Liberia 0 1000 t
  24. 3 Mauritania 0 1000 t
  25. 3 Lesotho 0 1000 t
  26. 3 Albania 0 1000 t compare
  27. 3 Cabo Verde 0 1000 t
  28. 3 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 t
  29. 3 Seychelles 0 1000 t
  30. 3 French Polynesia 0 1000 t
  31. 3 Jordan 0 1000 t compare
  32. 3 Kuwait 0 1000 t compare
  33. 3 Suriname 0 1000 t
  34. 3 Armenia 0 1000 t compare
  35. 3 Bahamas 0 1000 t
  36. 3 Iceland 0 1000 t
  37. 3 Montenegro 0 1000 t
  38. 3 Grenada 0 1000 t
  39. 3 Paraguay 0 1000 t
  40. 3 Samoa 0 1000 t
  41. 3 North Macedonia 0 1000 t
  42. 3 Saint Lucia 0 1000 t
  43. 3 Argentina 0 1000 t compare
  44. 3 Gabon 0 1000 t
  45. 3 Gambia 0 1000 t compare
  46. 3 Barbados 0 1000 t
  47. 3 Estonia 0 1000 t
  48. 3 Angola 0 1000 t
  49. 3 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t compare
  50. 3 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 1000 t
  51. 3 Maldives 0 1000 t
  52. 3 Iraq 0 1000 t
  53. 3 Sierra Leone 0 1000 t compare
  54. 3 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t compare
  55. 3 Finland 0 1000 t
  56. 3 Mauritius 0 1000 t
  57. 3 Azerbaijan 0 1000 t
  58. 3 Croatia 0 1000 t
  59. 3 Luxembourg 0 1000 t compare
  60. 3 Algeria 0 1000 t
  61. 3 Ireland 0 1000 t
  62. 3 Chile 0 1000 t compare
  63. 3 Tunisia 0 1000 t compare
  64. 3 Congo 0 1000 t
  65. 3 Latvia 0 1000 t
  66. 3 Lithuania 0 1000 t
  67. 3 New Caledonia 0 1000 t
  68. 3 Guinea 0 1000 t compare
  69. 3 Lao People's Democratic Republic 0 1000 t compare
  70. 3 Oman 0 1000 t
  71. 3 Papua New Guinea 0 1000 t
  72. 3 Malta 0 1000 t
  73. 3 Viet Nam 0 1000 t compare
  74. 3 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t
  75. 3 Saudi Arabia 0 1000 t
  76. 3 Republic of Moldova 0 1000 t compare
  77. 3 El Salvador 0 1000 t
  78. 3 Türkiye 0 1000 t compare
  79. 3 Belarus 0 1000 t compare
  80. 3 Malaysia 0 1000 t compare
  81. 3 Slovakia 0 1000 t
  82. 3 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 1000 t
  83. 3 Haiti 0 1000 t
  84. 3 Fiji 0 1000 t
  85. 3 Serbia 0 1000 t
  86. 3 Czechia 0 1000 t
  87. 3 Niger 0 1000 t
  88. 3 Slovenia 0 1000 t
  89. 3 Panama 0 1000 t compare
  90. 3 Nicaragua 0 1000 t compare
  91. 3 Greece 0 1000 t compare
  92. 3 Malawi 0 1000 t
  93. 3 Poland 0 1000 t compare
  94. 3 Yemen 0 1000 t compare
  95. 3 Norway 0 1000 t
  96. 3 Romania 0 1000 t
  97. 3 Belize 0 1000 t
  98. 3 Lebanon 0 1000 t
  99. 3 Jamaica 0 1000 t compare
  100. 3 Denmark 0 1000 t
  101. 3 Canada 0 1000 t
  102. 3 Hungary 0 1000 t compare
  103. 3 Austria 0 1000 t compare
  104. 3 Polynesia 0 1000 t
  105. 3 Switzerland 0 1000 t
  106. 3 Namibia 0 1000 t
  107. 3 Portugal 0 1000 t compare
  108. 3 Madagascar 0 1000 t
  109. 3 Italy 0 1000 t
  110. 3 Rwanda 0 1000 t compare
  111. 3 Cyprus 0 1000 t
  112. 3 China, Taiwan Province of 0 1000 t
  113. 3 Morocco 0 1000 t
  114. 3 Botswana 0 1000 t
  115. 3 Costa Rica 0 1000 t
  116. 3 Australia 0 1000 t compare
  117. 3 Zimbabwe 0 1000 t
  118. 3 Ecuador 0 1000 t compare
  119. 3 Sweden 0 1000 t compare
  120. 3 New Zealand 0 1000 t
  121. 3 Cameroon 0 1000 t
  122. 3 Honduras 0 1000 t
  123. 3 Bangladesh 0 1000 t compare
  124. 3 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 0 1000 t
  125. 3 Germany 0 1000 t
  126. 3 Ukraine 0 1000 t
  127. 3 Republic of Korea 0 1000 t
  128. 3 Ethiopia 0 1000 t compare
  129. 3 Philippines 0 1000 t
  130. 3 Spain 0 1000 t compare
  131. 3 Peru 0 1000 t
  132. 3 India 0 1000 t
  133. 3 Brazil 0 1000 t
  134. 3 Uganda 0 1000 t compare
  135. 3 Guatemala 0 1000 t compare
  136. 3 Pakistan 0 1000 t compare
  137. 3 China, mainland 0 1000 t
  138. 3 Egypt 0 1000 t compare
  139. 3 Colombia 0 1000 t
  140. 3 Melanesia 0 1000 t
  141. 3 Australia and New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  142. 3 Nepal 0 1000 t
  143. 3 Kenya 0 1000 t
  144. 3 China 0 1000 t compare
  145. 3 Nauru 0 1000 t
  146. 3 Laos 0 1000 t compare
  147. 3 Vietnam 0 1000 t compare
  148. 3 Moldova 0 1000 t compare
  149. 3 Turkey 0 1000 t compare
  150. 3 United Kingdom 0 1000 t

See the full ranking of 224 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

All data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) →

Frequently asked questions

What is nuts and products — residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Nuts and products — residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) was 44 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest nuts and products — residuals recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The highest recorded value was 78 1000 t in 2022.
What is the lowest nuts and products — residuals recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The lowest recorded value was -55 1000 t in 2018.
How does Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank for nuts and products — residuals?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 1st out of 30 groups with data for 2023.
Is nuts and products — residuals rising or falling in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Over the last ten years it is up 309.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Nuts and products — Residuals. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nuts and products — Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/nuts-and-products-residuals/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/nuts-and-products-residuals/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Nuts and products — Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nuts and products — Residuals
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
224 places, 3,046 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.