Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Chile
Chile: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) was 0.0588 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Chile, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Chile stood at 0.0588 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of up 0.7% on the previous year and up 10.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Chile peaked at 0.063 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0.0125 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 1997.
That places Chile 66th out of 117 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 56 years of available data.
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Chile, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.031 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0315 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1963 | 0.032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1964 | 0.0329 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1965 | 0.0252 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -23.5% |
| 1966 | 0.0291 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +15.4% |
| 1967 | 0.0266 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 1968 | 0.0262 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 1969 | 0.0263 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1970 | 0.0339 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +28.7% |
| 1971 | 0.0349 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1972 | 0.0339 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 1973 | 0.031 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.6% |
| 1974 | 0.031 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.0334 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1976 | 0.0363 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1977 | 0.0387 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1978 | 0.0291 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1979 | 0.0194 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 1980 | 0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1981 | 0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.0125 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -48.5% |
| 1998 | 0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +94.3% |
| 1999 | 0.0412 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +70.0% |
| 2000 | 0.046 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 2001 | 0.0436 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 2002 | 0.0496 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +13.8% |
| 2003 | 0.063 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +27.0% |
| 2004 | 0.0436 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -30.8% |
| 2005 | 0.0466 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 2006 | 0.0467 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2007 | 0.0441 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 2008 | 0.0533 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +20.9% |
| 2009 | 0.0484 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 2010 | 0.0482 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2011 | 0.0421 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -12.6% |
| 2012 | 0.0533 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +26.4% |
| 2013 | 0.0533 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 0.0531 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2015 | 0.0541 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2016 | 0.0558 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2017 | 0.0582 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2018 | 0.0582 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.0584 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2020 | 0.0586 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2021 | 0.0591 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2022 | 0.0584 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2023 | 0.0588 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.7% |
Chile compared with similar countries
- Chile's 0.0588 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.1351 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 44% of the median. (41 countries reporting)
- Chile's 0.0588 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.0534 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 1.1× the median. (24 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Chile changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | +94.3% | 0.0125 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
| 1999 | +70.0% | 0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0412 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
| 1997 | -48.5% | 0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0125 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
| 1979 | -33.3% | 0.0291 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0194 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
| 2004 | -30.8% | 0.063 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0436 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
| 1970 | +28.7% | 0.0263 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0339 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0252 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0329 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0322 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0194 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0387 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0259 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0125 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0412 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 3 |
| 2000s | 0.0485 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0436 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.063 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0535 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0421 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0584 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0588 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0584 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0591 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 63 Angola 0.0676 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 64 Sierra Leone 0.0675 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 65 Morocco 0.0646 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 67 Costa Rica 0.0588 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 68 Dominican Republic 0.0562 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 69 Kyrgyzstan 0.0553 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Chile
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -2.03 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0345 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 621.34 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.18 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1082 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 3.5% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 3.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 4.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Chile?
- Natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) in Chile was 0.0588 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 0.063 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2003.
- What is the lowest natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0125 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1997.
- How does Chile rank for natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
- Chile ranks 66th out of 117 countries with data for 2023.
- Is natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is up 10.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 56 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Natural honey — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.