Chile vs Costa Rica: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Chile
0.0588 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica
0.0588 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
66th
Costa Rica rank
67th

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Chile
  • Costa Rica
0.020.040.060.080.1196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0588 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0588 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 66th and Costa Rica ranks 67th of 117 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Costa Rica in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1960s 0.029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0286 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.0322 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0772 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 0.0259 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0877 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0618 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 0.0485 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0897 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0412 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 0.0535 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0798 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0263 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 0.0588 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0647 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Chile or Costa Rica?
Chile, at 0.0588 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0588 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Chile and Costa Rica?
0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Costa Rica?
56 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Costa Rica rank globally for natural honey — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Chile ranks 66th and Costa Rica ranks 67th of 117 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Costa Rica: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-honey-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/costa-rica/">Chile vs Costa Rica: Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
118 places, 5,932 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Natural honey — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.