Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per square in Brazil
Brazil: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per square was 0.6338 t per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per square in Brazil, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per square in Brazil is 0.6338 t per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.1% on the previous year and up 69.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per square in Brazil peaked at 0.6338 t per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.0639 t per square kilometre, in 1961.
Brazil ranks 52nd of 150 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per square in Brazil, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0639 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0704 t per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 1963 | 0.0688 t per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 1964 | 0.0692 t per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 1965 | 0.0713 t per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1966 | 0.0796 t per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 1967 | 0.0799 t per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1968 | 0.0858 t per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 1969 | 0.0861 t per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1970 | 0.0917 t per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 1971 | 0.096 t per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1972 | 0.0924 t per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 1973 | 0.0838 t per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 1974 | 0.0865 t per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1975 | 0.0909 t per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1976 | 0.0939 t per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1977 | 0.0998 t per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1978 | 0.1017 t per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1979 | 0.1077 t per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1980 | 0.1173 t per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 1981 | 0.1173 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.1041 t per square kilometre | -11.2% |
| 1983 | 0.1059 t per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1984 | 0.0906 t per square kilometre | -14.5% |
| 1985 | 0.0933 t per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1986 | 0.0987 t per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1987 | 0.1196 t per square kilometre | +21.2% |
| 1988 | 0.1316 t per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 1989 | 0.122 t per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 1990 | 0.1256 t per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1991 | 0.1436 t per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 1992 | 0.1508 t per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1993 | 0.1795 t per square kilometre | +19.0% |
| 1994 | 0.2034 t per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 1995 | 0.2154 t per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1996 | 0.2273 t per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1997 | 0.2453 t per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 1998 | 0.2871 t per square kilometre | +17.1% |
| 1999 | 0.2871 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.3111 t per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2001 | 0.3155 t per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2002 | 0.3348 t per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 2003 | 0.366 t per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 2004 | 0.3721 t per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2005 | 0.335 t per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 2006 | 0.3386 t per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2007 | 0.3577 t per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 2008 | 0.3607 t per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2009 | 0.3745 t per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2010 | 0.3823 t per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2011 | 0.3861 t per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2012 | 0.3768 t per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 2013 | 0.3729 t per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 2014 | 0.382 t per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2015 | 0.4105 t per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 2016 | 0.444 t per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 2017 | 0.4576 t per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2018 | 0.4727 t per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2019 | 0.4936 t per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2020 | 0.5363 t per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 2021 | 0.5861 t per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 2022 | 0.6209 t per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2023 | 0.6338 t per square kilometre | +2.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.075 t per square kilometre | 0.0639 t per square kilometre | 0.0861 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0944 t per square kilometre | 0.0838 t per square kilometre | 0.1077 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.11 t per square kilometre | 0.0906 t per square kilometre | 0.1316 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.2065 t per square kilometre | 0.1256 t per square kilometre | 0.2871 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.3466 t per square kilometre | 0.3111 t per square kilometre | 0.3745 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.4179 t per square kilometre | 0.3729 t per square kilometre | 0.4936 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.5943 t per square kilometre | 0.5363 t per square kilometre | 0.6338 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
More agriculture & rural data for Brazil
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.36 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0609 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 652.04 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.95 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1182 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.1% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.1% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 5.2% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per square in Brazil?
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per square in Brazil was 0.6338 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per square recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 0.6338 t per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per square recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0639 t per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Brazil rank for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per square?
- Brazil ranks 52nd out of 150 countries with data for 2023.
- Is meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per square rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is up 69.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.