Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross in Serbia
Serbia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross was 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in 2024. ▼ Falling
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross in Serbia, 2006–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Serbia is 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024. That is the lowest value across all 19 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 9.6% on the previous year and down 44.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Serbia peaked at 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, in 2024.
Serbia ranks 71st of 166 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 19 years of available data.
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross in Serbia, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2007 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -15.8% |
| 2008 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -13.6% |
| 2009 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +17.0% |
| 2010 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +3.1% |
| 2011 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -28.3% |
| 2012 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +10.6% |
| 2013 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -22.0% |
| 2014 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +10.3% |
| 2015 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +6.9% |
| 2016 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +5.2% |
| 2017 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -19.8% |
| 2018 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -0.1% |
| 2019 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -10.5% |
| 2020 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -0.8% |
| 2021 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -11.9% |
| 2022 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +5.1% |
| 2023 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -16.8% |
| 2024 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -9.6% |
Serbia compared with similar countries
- Serbia's 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, 1.4× the median. (49 countries reporting)
- Serbia's 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, 1.7× the median. (44 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 4 |
| 2010s | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Serbia
More agriculture & rural data for Serbia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 14.89 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0328 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 501.36 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.24 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3736 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 3.3% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 3.3% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 2.0% (2007)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.6% (2007)
Frequently asked questions
- What is meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Serbia?
- Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Serbia was 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in 2006.
- What is the lowest meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in 2024.
- How does Serbia rank for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
- Serbia ranks 71st out of 166 countries with data for 2024.
- Is meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross rising or falling in Serbia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 44.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.