Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross in Philippines
Philippines: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross was 1.55 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross in Philippines, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 USD per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Philippines stood at 1.55 1000 USD per square kilometre.
The figure is down 2.4% on the previous year and down 42.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Philippines peaked at 2.71 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2015 and was at its lowest, 0.5963 1000 USD per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Philippines 61st out of 122 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross in Philippines, year by year
| Year | 1000 USD per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.5963 1000 USD per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.7191 1000 USD per square kilometre | +20.6% |
| 1963 | 0.7598 1000 USD per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1964 | 0.7891 1000 USD per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1965 | 0.8223 1000 USD per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1966 | 0.9626 1000 USD per square kilometre | +17.1% |
| 1967 | 0.8395 1000 USD per square kilometre | -12.8% |
| 1968 | 0.7726 1000 USD per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 1969 | 0.7865 1000 USD per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1970 | 0.7735 1000 USD per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 1971 | 0.7194 1000 USD per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 1972 | 0.896 1000 USD per square kilometre | +24.5% |
| 1973 | 1.1 1000 USD per square kilometre | +22.7% |
| 1974 | 2.2 1000 USD per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1975 | 1.24 1000 USD per square kilometre | -43.8% |
| 1976 | 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre | -17.6% |
| 1977 | 1.1 1000 USD per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 1978 | 1.36 1000 USD per square kilometre | +23.5% |
| 1979 | 1.36 1000 USD per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 1980 | 1.3 1000 USD per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 1981 | 0.9777 1000 USD per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1982 | 0.7995 1000 USD per square kilometre | -18.2% |
| 1983 | 0.8148 1000 USD per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1984 | 0.7992 1000 USD per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 1985 | 0.822 1000 USD per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1986 | 0.9192 1000 USD per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 1987 | 0.9708 1000 USD per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1988 | 0.8989 1000 USD per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 1989 | 1.07 1000 USD per square kilometre | +19.5% |
| 1990 | 1.06 1000 USD per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 1991 | 1.1 1000 USD per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1992 | 1.04 1000 USD per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 1993 | 1.03 1000 USD per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1994 | 0.9813 1000 USD per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 1995 | 0.9131 1000 USD per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 1996 | 1.12 1000 USD per square kilometre | +22.7% |
| 1997 | 1.27 1000 USD per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 1998 | 1.56 1000 USD per square kilometre | +23.2% |
| 1999 | 1.8 1000 USD per square kilometre | +15.4% |
| 2000 | 1.94 1000 USD per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 2001 | 2.21 1000 USD per square kilometre | +13.9% |
| 2002 | 2.15 1000 USD per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 2003 | 2.15 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2004 | 2.26 1000 USD per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2005 | 2.27 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2006 | 2.19 1000 USD per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 2007 | 2.38 1000 USD per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 2008 | 2.47 1000 USD per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2009 | 2.54 1000 USD per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2010 | 2.63 1000 USD per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2011 | 2.62 1000 USD per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2012 | 2.58 1000 USD per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 2013 | 2.68 1000 USD per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2014 | 2.69 1000 USD per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2015 | 2.71 1000 USD per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2016 | 2.46 1000 USD per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 2017 | 2.13 1000 USD per square kilometre | -13.3% |
| 2018 | 1.76 1000 USD per square kilometre | -17.4% |
| 2019 | 1.74 1000 USD per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 2020 | 1.52 1000 USD per square kilometre | -12.4% |
| 2021 | 1.56 1000 USD per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2022 | 1.59 1000 USD per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2023 | 1.55 1000 USD per square kilometre | -2.4% |
Philippines compared with similar countries
- Philippines's 1.55 1000 USD per square kilometre is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 1.48 1000 USD per square kilometre, 1.0× the median. (39 countries reporting)
- Philippines's 1.55 1000 USD per square kilometre is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.9407 1000 USD per square kilometre, 1.7× the median. (12 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross in Philippines changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1974 | +100.0% | 1.1 1000 USD per square kilometre | 2.2 1000 USD per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.7831 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.5963 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.9626 1000 USD per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.18 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.7194 1000 USD per square kilometre | 2.2 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.938 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.7992 1000 USD per square kilometre | 1.3 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.19 1000 USD per square kilometre | 0.9131 1000 USD per square kilometre | 1.8 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.26 1000 USD per square kilometre | 1.94 1000 USD per square kilometre | 2.54 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.4 1000 USD per square kilometre | 1.74 1000 USD per square kilometre | 2.71 1000 USD per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.56 1000 USD per square kilometre | 1.52 1000 USD per square kilometre | 1.59 1000 USD per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Philippines
- 58 Norway 1.67 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 59 Ethiopia 1.66 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 60 Guinea-Bissau 1.58 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 62 Romania 1.49 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 63 Georgia 1.48 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
- 64 Grenada 1.48 1000 USD per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Philippines
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -0.2488 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0859 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 358.34 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.0874 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.4423 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 8.6% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 8.6% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.6% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Philippines?
- Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross in Philippines was 1.55 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross recorded in Philippines?
- The highest recorded value was 2.71 1000 USD per square kilometre in 2015.
- What is the lowest meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross recorded in Philippines?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.5963 1000 USD per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Philippines rank for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
- Philippines ranks 61st out of 122 countries with data for 2023.
- Is meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross rising or falling in Philippines?
- Over the last ten years it is down 42.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Philippines data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.