Philippines vs Romania: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Philippines
1.55 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
1.49 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2017
Philippines rank
61st
Romania rank
62nd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Philippines
  • Romania
1234196119922023

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 1.55 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.49 1000 USD per square kilometre in Romania, a difference of 0.06 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Philippines ranks 61st and Romania ranks 62nd of 122 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7831 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.47 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.69 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
1970s 1.18 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.42 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.24 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
1980s 0.938 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.08 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.14 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
1990s 1.22 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.85 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.64 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
2000s 2.26 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.19 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0656 1000 USD per square kilometre Philippines
2010s 2.56 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.61 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9467 1000 USD per square kilometre Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Philippines or Romania?
Philippines, at 1.55 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.49 1000 USD per square kilometre in Romania as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Philippines and Romania?
0.06 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Romania?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Philippines and Romania rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Philippines ranks 61st and Romania ranks 62nd of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs Romania: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/philippines/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/philippines/romania/">Philippines vs Romania: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.