Meat supply vs. GDP per capita in Tuvalu
Tuvalu: Meat supply vs. GDP per capita was 85.07 kilograms per year per capita in 2023. ▼ Falling
Meat supply vs. GDP per capita in Tuvalu, 2019–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in kilograms per year per capita.
Analysis
Tuvalu recorded 85.07 kilograms per year per capita for meat supply vs. gdp per capita in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 11.5% on the previous year and up 2.3% over five years.
That places Tuvalu 35th out of 192 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
Meat supply vs. GDP per capita in Tuvalu, year by year
| Year | kilograms per year per capita | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 83.15 kilograms per year per capita | — |
| 2020 | 95.07 kilograms per year per capita | +14.3% |
| 2021 | 80.37 kilograms per year per capita | -15.5% |
| 2022 | 76.33 kilograms per year per capita | -5.0% |
| 2023 | 85.07 kilograms per year per capita | +11.5% |
Tuvalu compared with similar countries
- Tuvalu's 85.07 kilograms per year per capita is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 58.27 kilograms per year per capita, 1.5× the median. (57 countries reporting)
- Tuvalu's 85.07 kilograms per year per capita is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 66.53 kilograms per year per capita, 1.3× the median. (32 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 83.15 kilograms per year per capita | 83.15 kilograms per year per capita | 83.15 kilograms per year per capita | 1 |
| 2020s | 84.21 kilograms per year per capita | 76.33 kilograms per year per capita | 95.07 kilograms per year per capita | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tuvalu
- 32 Saint Kitts and Nevis 88.84 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 33 Guyana 88.72 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 34 Dominica 86.44 kilograms per year per capita
- 36 Russia 84.77 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 37 United Kingdom 84.44 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 38 Bolivia 84.43 kilograms per year per capita compare
More agriculture & rural data for Tuvalu
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -17.15 % change on previous year (2015)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.1594 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2015)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 534.44 current US$ per person (2015)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -3.61 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3456 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 15.9% (2015)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 15.9% (2015)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.1% (2008)
- Rural population 34.6% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is meat supply vs. gdp per capita in Tuvalu?
- Meat supply vs. gdp per capita in Tuvalu was 85.07 kilograms per year per capita in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest meat supply vs. gdp per capita recorded in Tuvalu?
- The highest recorded value was 95.07 kilograms per year per capita in 2020.
- What is the lowest meat supply vs. gdp per capita recorded in Tuvalu?
- The lowest recorded value was 76.33 kilograms per year per capita in 2022.
- How does Tuvalu rank for meat supply vs. gdp per capita?
- Tuvalu ranks 35th out of 192 countries with data for 2023.
- Where does this Tuvalu data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Meat supply vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.