Guyana vs Tuvalu: Meat supply vs. GDP per capita
Guyana
88.72 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Tuvalu
85.07 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Guyana rank
33rd
Tuvalu rank
35th
Meat supply vs. GDP per capita over time
- Guyana
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 88.72 kilograms per year per capita against 85.07 kilograms per year per capita in Tuvalu, a difference of 3.65 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Tuvalu ahead.
Guyana ranks 33rd and Tuvalu ranks 35th of 192 countries.
Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 59.48 kilograms per year per capita | 83.15 kilograms per year per capita | 23.67 kilograms per year per capita | Tuvalu |
| 2020s | 76.88 kilograms per year per capita | 84.21 kilograms per year per capita | 7.33 kilograms per year per capita | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat supply vs. gdp per capita, Guyana or Tuvalu?
- Guyana, at 88.72 kilograms per year per capita against 85.07 kilograms per year per capita in Tuvalu as of 2023.
- What is the difference in meat supply vs. gdp per capita between Guyana and Tuvalu?
- 3.65 kilograms per year per capita, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Tuvalu?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Guyana and Tuvalu rank globally for meat supply vs. gdp per capita?
- Guyana ranks 33rd and Tuvalu ranks 35th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meat supply vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.