Marine Fish, Other — Stock Variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Marine Fish, Other — Stock Variation was 0 1000 t in 2023. ▬ Flat

Latest (2023)
0 1000 t
Rank
1st
of 28 groups
All-time high
28 1000 t
in 2016
All-time low
-27 1000 t
in 2017
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Marine Fish, Other — Stock Variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), 2010–2023

-200202010201620232010: 0 1000 t2011: 0 1000 t2012: 0 1000 t2013: 0 1000 t2014: 0 1000 t2015: 0 1000 t2016: 28 1000 t2017: -27 1000 t2018: 0 1000 t2019: -1 1000 t2020: 0 1000 t2021: 0 1000 t2022: 0 1000 t2023: 0 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) recorded 0 1000 t for marine fish, other — stock variation in 2023.

Over the whole period, marine fish, other — stock variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) peaked at 28 1000 t in 2016 and was at its lowest, -27 1000 t, in 2017.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 1st of 28 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.

Marine Fish, Other — Stock Variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), year by year

Annual values for Marine Fish, Other — Stock Variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), 2010 to 2023.
Year 1000 t Change
2010 0 1000 t
2011 0 1000 t
2012 0 1000 t
2013 0 1000 t
2014 0 1000 t
2015 0 1000 t
2016 28 1000 t
2017 -27 1000 t -196.4%
2018 0 1000 t -100.0%
2019 -1 1000 t
2020 0 1000 t -100.0%
2021 0 1000 t
2022 0 1000 t
2023 0 1000 t

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 0 1000 t -27 1000 t 28 1000 t 10
2020s 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

  1. 1 Tuvalu 0 1000 t
  2. 1 Marshall Islands 0 1000 t
  3. 1 Tonga 0 1000 t
  4. 1 Qatar 0 1000 t
  5. 1 Bahrain 0 1000 t
  6. 1 Cuba 0 1000 t
  7. 1 Turkmenistan 0 1000 t
  8. 1 Lesotho 0 1000 t
  9. 1 Kiribati 0 1000 t
  10. 1 Sao Tome and Principe 0 1000 t compare
  11. 1 Micronesia 0 1000 t
  12. 1 China, Macao SAR 0 1000 t
  13. 1 Mauritania 0 1000 t
  14. 1 Mongolia 0 1000 t
  15. 1 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 t
  16. 1 Libya 0 1000 t
  17. 1 Solomon Islands 0 1000 t compare
  18. 1 Albania 0 1000 t
  19. 1 Suriname 0 1000 t
  20. 1 Kuwait 0 1000 t
  21. 1 Maldives 0 1000 t
  22. 1 Vanuatu 0 1000 t
  23. 1 Armenia 0 1000 t
  24. 1 Gabon 0 1000 t compare
  25. 1 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 t
  26. 1 Eswatini 0 1000 t
  27. 1 Cabo Verde 0 1000 t
  28. 1 Papua New Guinea 0 1000 t compare
  29. 1 Samoa 0 1000 t
  30. 1 Grenada 0 1000 t
  31. 1 Niger 0 1000 t
  32. 1 Guyana 0 1000 t compare
  33. 1 Azerbaijan 0 1000 t
  34. 1 Burkina Faso 0 1000 t
  35. 1 North Macedonia 0 1000 t
  36. 1 Georgia 0 1000 t
  37. 1 Oman 0 1000 t
  38. 1 Seychelles 0 1000 t
  39. 1 New Caledonia 0 1000 t
  40. 1 Iceland 0 1000 t
  41. 1 Viet Nam 0 1000 t compare
  42. 1 Namibia 0 1000 t
  43. 1 Estonia 0 1000 t
  44. 1 Bahamas 0 1000 t
  45. 1 Rwanda 0 1000 t
  46. 1 Serbia 0 1000 t
  47. 1 Lithuania 0 1000 t
  48. 1 Finland 0 1000 t
  49. 1 Belarus 0 1000 t
  50. 1 Barbados 0 1000 t
  51. 1 Myanmar 0 1000 t compare
  52. 1 Nicaragua 0 1000 t
  53. 1 Chile 0 1000 t
  54. 1 Latvia 0 1000 t
  55. 1 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t
  56. 1 Zambia 0 1000 t
  57. 1 Mozambique 0 1000 t
  58. 1 Norway 0 1000 t
  59. 1 Bulgaria 0 1000 t
  60. 1 Dominican Republic 0 1000 t
  61. 1 Syrian Arab Republic 0 1000 t
  62. 1 Panama 0 1000 t
  63. 1 Ireland 0 1000 t
  64. 1 Slovenia 0 1000 t
  65. 1 Lebanon 0 1000 t
  66. 1 Romania 0 1000 t
  67. 1 El Salvador 0 1000 t
  68. 1 Belize 0 1000 t
  69. 1 Mauritius 0 1000 t
  70. 1 Belgium 0 1000 t compare
  71. 1 Austria 0 1000 t compare
  72. 1 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 1000 t
  73. 1 United Arab Emirates 0 1000 t
  74. 1 Portugal 0 1000 t
  75. 1 Denmark 0 1000 t
  76. 1 Zimbabwe 0 1000 t
  77. 1 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t compare
  78. 1 Malta 0 1000 t
  79. 1 Poland 0 1000 t
  80. 1 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 1000 t
  81. 1 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t compare
  82. 1 New Zealand 0 1000 t
  83. 1 Malaysia 0 1000 t
  84. 1 Kazakhstan 0 1000 t
  85. 1 Morocco 0 1000 t
  86. 1 Sweden 0 1000 t
  87. 1 Fiji 0 1000 t
  88. 1 Ecuador 0 1000 t
  89. 1 Australia 0 1000 t
  90. 1 China, Taiwan Province of 0 1000 t
  91. 1 France 0 1000 t
  92. 1 Polynesia 0 1000 t
  93. 1 Pakistan 0 1000 t
  94. 1 Cyprus 0 1000 t
  95. 1 India 0 1000 t
  96. 1 Germany 0 1000 t
  97. 1 Italy 0 1000 t compare
  98. 1 Costa Rica 0 1000 t compare
  99. 1 Spain 0 1000 t
  100. 1 Honduras 0 1000 t
  101. 1 Peru 0 1000 t compare
  102. 1 United Republic of Tanzania 0 1000 t
  103. 1 Colombia 0 1000 t
  104. 1 Thailand 0 1000 t compare
  105. 1 China, mainland 0 1000 t compare
  106. 1 Egypt 0 1000 t
  107. 1 Mexico 0 1000 t compare
  108. 1 Guatemala 0 1000 t
  109. 1 Australia and New Zealand 0 1000 t
  110. 1 Indonesia 0 1000 t
  111. 1 Kenya 0 1000 t
  112. 1 Melanesia 0 1000 t compare
  113. 1 China 0 1000 t compare

See the full ranking of 145 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

All data for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) →

Frequently asked questions

What is marine fish, other — stock variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Marine fish, other — stock variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) was 0 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest marine fish, other — stock variation recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
The highest recorded value was 28 1000 t in 2016.
What is the lowest marine fish, other — stock variation recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
The lowest recorded value was -27 1000 t in 2017.
How does Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank for marine fish, other — stock variation?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 1st out of 28 groups with data for 2023.
Where does this Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Marine Fish, Other — Stock Variation. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Marine Fish, Other — Stock Variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/marine-fish-other-stock-variation/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/marine-fish-other-stock-variation/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Marine Fish, Other — Stock Variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Marine Fish, Other — Stock Variation
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
145 places, 1,958 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.