Maize and products β€” Tourist consumption in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Maize and products β€” Tourist consumption was 1 1000 t in 2023. β—† Volatile

Latest (2023)
1 1000 t
Change on year
unchanged
Rank
7th
of 24 groups
All-time high
2 1000 t
in 2011
All-time low
0 1000 t
in 2016
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Maize and products β€” Tourist consumption in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), 2010–2023

00.511.522010201620232010: 1 1000 t2011: 2 1000 t2012: 2 1000 t2013: 2 1000 t2014: 2 1000 t2015: 2 1000 t2016: 0 1000 t2017: 1 1000 t2018: 1 1000 t2019: 1 1000 t2020: 0 1000 t2021: 0 1000 t2022: 1 1000 t2023: 1 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

In 2023, maize and products β€” tourist consumption in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) stood at 1 1000 t.

That represents a change of down 50.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, maize and products β€” tourist consumption in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) peaked at 2 1000 t in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 t, in 2016.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th of 24 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 1.4 1000 t 0 1000 t 2 1000 t 10
2020s 0.5 1000 t 0 1000 t 1 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

  1. 5 Cuba 0 1000 t compare
  2. 5 Kiribati 0 1000 t compare
  3. 5 Comoros 0 1000 t compare
  4. 5 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t compare
  5. 5 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 t compare
  6. 5 Bahamas 0 1000 t compare
  7. 5 French Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
  8. 5 Cabo Verde 0 1000 t compare
  9. 5 Maldives 0 1000 t compare
  10. 5 Sao Tome and Principe 0 1000 t compare
  11. 5 Samoa 0 1000 t compare
  12. 5 Barbados 0 1000 t compare
  13. 5 Grenada 0 1000 t compare
  14. 5 Seychelles 0 1000 t compare
  15. 5 Micronesia 0 1000 t compare
  16. 5 Botswana 0 1000 t compare
  17. 5 Solomon Islands 0 1000 t compare
  18. 5 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t compare
  19. 5 Belize 0 1000 t compare
  20. 5 Vanuatu 0 1000 t compare
  21. 5 Cambodia 0 1000 t compare
  22. 5 Saint Lucia 0 1000 t compare
  23. 5 Fiji 0 1000 t compare
  24. 5 Dominican Republic 0 1000 t compare
  25. 5 Lao People's Democratic Republic 0 1000 t compare
  26. 5 Cyprus 0 1000 t compare
  27. 5 Indonesia 0 1000 t compare
  28. 5 New Caledonia 0 1000 t compare
  29. 5 Jamaica 0 1000 t compare
  30. 5 Mauritius 0 1000 t compare
  31. 5 Honduras 0 1000 t compare
  32. 5 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 t compare
  33. 5 Malta 0 1000 t compare
  34. 5 Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
  35. 5 Egypt 0 1000 t compare
  36. 5 China 0 1000 t compare
  37. 5 Kenya 0 1000 t compare
  38. 5 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t compare
  39. 5 Nepal 0 1000 t compare
  40. 5 Melanesia 0 1000 t compare

See the full ranking of 68 places β†’

More agriculture & rural data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

All data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is maize and products β€” tourist consumption in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Maize and products β€” tourist consumption in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) was 1 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest maize and products β€” tourist consumption recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The highest recorded value was 2 1000 t in 2011.
What is the lowest maize and products β€” tourist consumption recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2016.
How does Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank for maize and products β€” tourist consumption?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th out of 24 groups with data for 2023.
Is maize and products β€” tourist consumption rising or falling in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Over the last ten years it is down 50.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Maize and products β€” Tourist consumption. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Maize and products β€” Tourist consumption in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/maize-and-products-tourist-consumption/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/maize-and-products-tourist-consumption/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Maize and products β€” Tourist consumption in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Maize and products β€” Tourist consumption
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
68 places, 918 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.