Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross in Southern Asia
Southern Asia: Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross was 62,833 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▼ Falling
Latest (2024)
62,833 1000 Int$
Change on year
up 0.2%
Rank
2nd
of 19 groups
All-time high
281,508 1000 Int$
in 1963
All-time low
62,103 1000 Int$
in 2015
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross in Southern Asia, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross in Southern Asia is 62,833 1000 Int$, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of up 0.2% on the previous year and down 2.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross in Southern Asia peaked at 281,508 1000 Int$ in 1963 and was at its lowest, 62,103 1000 Int$, in 2015.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 64 years of available data.
Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross in Southern Asia, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 280,722 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 266,762 1000 Int$ | -5.0% |
| 1963 | 281,508 1000 Int$ | +5.5% |
| 1964 | 257,949 1000 Int$ | -8.4% |
| 1965 | 215,901 1000 Int$ | -16.3% |
| 1966 | 190,596 1000 Int$ | -11.7% |
| 1967 | 223,878 1000 Int$ | +17.5% |
| 1968 | 162,369 1000 Int$ | -27.5% |
| 1969 | 197,010 1000 Int$ | +21.3% |
| 1970 | 199,715 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 1971 | 177,839 1000 Int$ | -11.0% |
| 1972 | 171,696 1000 Int$ | -3.5% |
| 1973 | 211,531 1000 Int$ | +23.2% |
| 1974 | 198,448 1000 Int$ | -6.2% |
| 1975 | 213,988 1000 Int$ | +7.8% |
| 1976 | 240,301 1000 Int$ | +12.3% |
| 1977 | 245,500 1000 Int$ | +2.2% |
| 1978 | 253,991 1000 Int$ | +3.5% |
| 1979 | 250,135 1000 Int$ | -1.5% |
| 1980 | 225,592 1000 Int$ | -9.8% |
| 1981 | 219,607 1000 Int$ | -2.7% |
| 1982 | 170,595 1000 Int$ | -22.3% |
| 1983 | 192,305 1000 Int$ | +12.7% |
| 1984 | 181,956 1000 Int$ | -5.4% |
| 1985 | 238,939 1000 Int$ | +31.3% |
| 1986 | 180,918 1000 Int$ | -24.3% |
| 1987 | 143,447 1000 Int$ | -20.7% |
| 1988 | 158,825 1000 Int$ | +10.7% |
| 1989 | 165,903 1000 Int$ | +4.5% |
| 1990 | 181,289 1000 Int$ | +9.3% |
| 1991 | 181,208 1000 Int$ | -0.0% |
| 1992 | 144,623 1000 Int$ | -20.2% |
| 1993 | 143,412 1000 Int$ | -0.8% |
| 1994 | 150,467 1000 Int$ | +4.9% |
| 1995 | 146,524 1000 Int$ | -2.6% |
| 1996 | 176,208 1000 Int$ | +20.3% |
| 1997 | 118,942 1000 Int$ | -32.5% |
| 1998 | 110,616 1000 Int$ | -7.0% |
| 1999 | 125,196 1000 Int$ | +13.2% |
| 2000 | 127,195 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 2001 | 139,256 1000 Int$ | +9.5% |
| 2002 | 122,892 1000 Int$ | -11.8% |
| 2003 | 112,510 1000 Int$ | -8.4% |
| 2004 | 103,261 1000 Int$ | -8.2% |
| 2005 | 97,867 1000 Int$ | -5.2% |
| 2006 | 97,468 1000 Int$ | -0.4% |
| 2007 | 106,862 1000 Int$ | +9.6% |
| 2008 | 110,028 1000 Int$ | +3.0% |
| 2009 | 81,402 1000 Int$ | -26.0% |
| 2010 | 65,999 1000 Int$ | -18.9% |
| 2011 | 71,654 1000 Int$ | +8.6% |
| 2012 | 69,985 1000 Int$ | -2.3% |
| 2013 | 67,108 1000 Int$ | -4.1% |
| 2014 | 64,425 1000 Int$ | -4.0% |
| 2015 | 62,103 1000 Int$ | -3.6% |
| 2016 | 63,781 1000 Int$ | +2.7% |
| 2017 | 62,787 1000 Int$ | -1.6% |
| 2018 | 62,571 1000 Int$ | -0.3% |
| 2019 | 62,970 1000 Int$ | +0.6% |
| 2020 | 62,721 1000 Int$ | -0.4% |
| 2021 | 62,694 1000 Int$ | -0.0% |
| 2022 | 62,796 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
| 2023 | 62,735 1000 Int$ | -0.1% |
| 2024 | 62,833 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 230,744 1000 Int$ | 162,369 1000 Int$ | 281,508 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 216,314 1000 Int$ | 171,696 1000 Int$ | 253,991 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 187,809 1000 Int$ | 143,447 1000 Int$ | 238,939 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 147,848 1000 Int$ | 110,616 1000 Int$ | 181,289 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 109,874 1000 Int$ | 81,402 1000 Int$ | 139,256 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 65,338 1000 Int$ | 62,103 1000 Int$ | 71,654 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 62,756 1000 Int$ | 62,694 1000 Int$ | 62,833 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Southern Asia
- 1 India 62,536 1000 Int$ compare
- 2 Russian Federation 30,881 1000 Int$ compare
- 3 USSR 26,094 1000 Int$ compare
- 4 China 13,651 1000 Int$ compare
- 4 China, mainland 13,651 1000 Int$ compare
- 5 Democratic Republic of the Congo 4,808 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Southern Asia
- Beef and Buffalo Meat, primary — Production, annual growth rate 4.72 % change on previous year (2024)
- Citrus Fruit, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate 2.28 % change on previous year (2024)
- Cereals, primary — Production, annual growth rate 4.15 % change on previous year (2024)
- Cereals, primary — Yield, annual growth rate 0.8614 % change on previous year (2024)
- Cereals, primary — Area harvested, annual growth rate 3.26 % change on previous year (2024)
- Cattle and Buffaloes — Stocks, annual growth rate 1.08 % change on previous year (2024)
- Beef and Buffalo Meat, primary — Producing Animals/Slaughtered 2.8 % change on previous year (2024)
- Raw milk of cattle — Milk Animals, annual growth rate 4.28 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sheep — Stocks, annual growth rate 3.87 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sheep fat, unrendered — Production, annual growth rate 5.81 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross in Southern Asia?
- Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross in Southern Asia was 62,833 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross recorded in Southern Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 281,508 1000 Int$ in 1963.
- What is the lowest kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross recorded in Southern Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was 62,103 1000 Int$ in 2015.
- How does Southern Asia rank for kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross?
- Southern Asia ranks 2nd out of 19 groups with data for 2024.
- Is kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross rising or falling in Southern Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 2.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Southern Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.