Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross in China
China: Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross was 13,651 1000 Int$ in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
13,651 1000 Int$
Change on year
up 0.8%
World rank
4th
of 26 countries
All-time high
675,035 1000 Int$
in 1985
All-time low
12,273 1000 Int$
in 2017
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross in China, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross in China is 13,651 1000 Int$, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of up 0.8% on the previous year and down 5.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross in China peaked at 675,035 1000 Int$ in 1985 and was at its lowest, 12,273 1000 Int$, in 2017.
China ranks 4th of 26 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross in China, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 40,502 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 22,092 1000 Int$ | -45.5% |
| 1963 | 32,831 1000 Int$ | +48.6% |
| 1964 | 38,968 1000 Int$ | +18.7% |
| 1965 | 46,332 1000 Int$ | +18.9% |
| 1966 | 57,685 1000 Int$ | +24.5% |
| 1967 | 65,969 1000 Int$ | +14.4% |
| 1968 | 65,662 1000 Int$ | -0.5% |
| 1969 | 57,071 1000 Int$ | -13.1% |
| 1970 | 52,162 1000 Int$ | -8.6% |
| 1971 | 50,321 1000 Int$ | -3.5% |
| 1972 | 62,901 1000 Int$ | +25.0% |
| 1973 | 92,357 1000 Int$ | +46.8% |
| 1974 | 104,324 1000 Int$ | +13.0% |
| 1975 | 115,676 1000 Int$ | +10.9% |
| 1976 | 119,665 1000 Int$ | +3.4% |
| 1977 | 141,144 1000 Int$ | +17.9% |
| 1978 | 180,418 1000 Int$ | +27.8% |
| 1979 | 180,725 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
| 1980 | 180,418 1000 Int$ | -0.2% |
| 1981 | 208,770 1000 Int$ | +15.7% |
| 1982 | 177,964 1000 Int$ | -14.8% |
| 1983 | 171,827 1000 Int$ | -3.4% |
| 1984 | 248,536 1000 Int$ | +44.6% |
| 1985 | 675,035 1000 Int$ | +171.6% |
| 1986 | 230,126 1000 Int$ | -65.9% |
| 1987 | 165,077 1000 Int$ | -28.3% |
| 1988 | 147,280 1000 Int$ | -10.8% |
| 1989 | 184,100 1000 Int$ | +25.0% |
| 1990 | 200,056 1000 Int$ | +8.7% |
| 1991 | 141,757 1000 Int$ | -29.1% |
| 1992 | 171,213 1000 Int$ | +20.8% |
| 1993 | 185,941 1000 Int$ | +8.6% |
| 1994 | 98,187 1000 Int$ | -47.2% |
| 1995 | 102,483 1000 Int$ | +4.4% |
| 1996 | 96,960 1000 Int$ | -5.4% |
| 1997 | 114,142 1000 Int$ | +17.7% |
| 1998 | 68,757 1000 Int$ | -39.8% |
| 1999 | 43,264 1000 Int$ | -37.1% |
| 2000 | 33,058 1000 Int$ | -23.6% |
| 2001 | 28,221 1000 Int$ | -14.6% |
| 2002 | 42,341 1000 Int$ | +50.0% |
| 2003 | 27,001 1000 Int$ | -36.2% |
| 2004 | 23,491 1000 Int$ | -13.0% |
| 2005 | 22,399 1000 Int$ | -4.6% |
| 2006 | 23,442 1000 Int$ | +4.7% |
| 2007 | 26,695 1000 Int$ | +13.9% |
| 2008 | 22,767 1000 Int$ | -14.7% |
| 2009 | 20,251 1000 Int$ | -11.1% |
| 2010 | 17,989 1000 Int$ | -11.2% |
| 2011 | 19,441 1000 Int$ | +8.1% |
| 2012 | 17,551 1000 Int$ | -9.7% |
| 2013 | 15,771 1000 Int$ | -10.1% |
| 2014 | 14,433 1000 Int$ | -8.5% |
| 2015 | 13,660 1000 Int$ | -5.4% |
| 2016 | 13,666 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 12,273 1000 Int$ | -10.2% |
| 2018 | 13,733 1000 Int$ | +11.9% |
| 2019 | 13,640 1000 Int$ | -0.7% |
| 2020 | 13,215 1000 Int$ | -3.1% |
| 2021 | 13,845 1000 Int$ | +4.8% |
| 2022 | 13,567 1000 Int$ | -2.0% |
| 2023 | 13,542 1000 Int$ | -0.2% |
| 2024 | 13,651 1000 Int$ | +0.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 47,457 1000 Int$ | 22,092 1000 Int$ | 65,969 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 109,969 1000 Int$ | 50,321 1000 Int$ | 180,725 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 238,913 1000 Int$ | 147,280 1000 Int$ | 675,035 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 122,276 1000 Int$ | 43,264 1000 Int$ | 200,056 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 26,967 1000 Int$ | 20,251 1000 Int$ | 42,341 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 15,216 1000 Int$ | 12,273 1000 Int$ | 19,441 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 13,564 1000 Int$ | 13,215 1000 Int$ | 13,845 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near China
- 1 India 62,536 1000 Int$ compare
- 2 Russian Federation 30,881 1000 Int$ compare
- 3 USSR 26,094 1000 Int$ compare
- 4 China, mainland 13,651 1000 Int$ compare
- 5 Democratic Republic of the Congo 4,808 1000 Int$ compare
- 6 Cuba 7,325 1000 Int$ compare
- 7 Chile 5,545 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for China
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 1.98 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0666 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 923.03 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.48 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3366 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.3% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 2.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross in China?
- Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross in China was 13,651 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was 675,035 1000 Int$ in 1985.
- What is the lowest kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was 12,273 1000 Int$ in 2017.
- How does China rank for kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross?
- China ranks 4th out of 26 countries with data for 2024.
- Is kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross rising or falling in China?
- Over the last ten years it is down 5.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.