Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross in Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross was 9,331 1000 Int$ in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
9,331 1000 Int$
Change on year
up 0.9%
Rank
2nd
of 5 groups
All-time high
45,806 1000 Int$
in 1967
All-time low
7,770 1000 Int$
in 1992
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) is 9,331 1000 Int$, measured in 2024.
The figure is up 0.9% on the previous year and down 7.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) peaked at 45,806 1000 Int$ in 1967 and was at its lowest, 7,770 1000 Int$, in 1992.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 30,809 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 28,932 1000 Int$ | -6.1% |
| 1963 | 29,279 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 1964 | 35,343 1000 Int$ | +20.7% |
| 1965 | 43,071 1000 Int$ | +21.9% |
| 1966 | 25,962 1000 Int$ | -39.7% |
| 1967 | 45,806 1000 Int$ | +76.4% |
| 1968 | 28,336 1000 Int$ | -38.1% |
| 1969 | 39,945 1000 Int$ | +41.0% |
| 1970 | 29,075 1000 Int$ | -27.2% |
| 1971 | 22,254 1000 Int$ | -23.5% |
| 1972 | 22,560 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 1973 | 21,276 1000 Int$ | -5.7% |
| 1974 | 14,800 1000 Int$ | -30.4% |
| 1975 | 15,193 1000 Int$ | +2.7% |
| 1976 | 14,113 1000 Int$ | -7.1% |
| 1977 | 14,516 1000 Int$ | +2.9% |
| 1978 | 16,517 1000 Int$ | +13.8% |
| 1979 | 14,538 1000 Int$ | -12.0% |
| 1980 | 10,922 1000 Int$ | -24.9% |
| 1981 | 11,090 1000 Int$ | +1.5% |
| 1982 | 11,213 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 1983 | 11,276 1000 Int$ | +0.6% |
| 1984 | 11,474 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 1985 | 12,165 1000 Int$ | +6.0% |
| 1986 | 12,321 1000 Int$ | +1.3% |
| 1987 | 11,769 1000 Int$ | -4.5% |
| 1988 | 11,087 1000 Int$ | -5.8% |
| 1989 | 11,958 1000 Int$ | +7.9% |
| 1990 | 16,576 1000 Int$ | +38.6% |
| 1991 | 10,607 1000 Int$ | -36.0% |
| 1992 | 7,770 1000 Int$ | -26.7% |
| 1993 | 8,502 1000 Int$ | +9.4% |
| 1994 | 11,774 1000 Int$ | +38.5% |
| 1995 | 8,587 1000 Int$ | -27.1% |
| 1996 | 9,839 1000 Int$ | +14.6% |
| 1997 | 9,219 1000 Int$ | -6.3% |
| 1998 | 10,267 1000 Int$ | +11.4% |
| 1999 | 9,979 1000 Int$ | -2.8% |
| 2000 | 9,384 1000 Int$ | -6.0% |
| 2001 | 9,852 1000 Int$ | +5.0% |
| 2002 | 11,042 1000 Int$ | +12.1% |
| 2003 | 14,507 1000 Int$ | +31.4% |
| 2004 | 15,732 1000 Int$ | +8.4% |
| 2005 | 11,724 1000 Int$ | -25.5% |
| 2006 | 17,446 1000 Int$ | +48.8% |
| 2007 | 21,548 1000 Int$ | +23.5% |
| 2008 | 17,487 1000 Int$ | -18.8% |
| 2009 | 15,791 1000 Int$ | -9.7% |
| 2010 | 14,559 1000 Int$ | -7.8% |
| 2011 | 13,732 1000 Int$ | -5.7% |
| 2012 | 12,508 1000 Int$ | -8.9% |
| 2013 | 11,437 1000 Int$ | -8.6% |
| 2014 | 10,089 1000 Int$ | -11.8% |
| 2015 | 10,837 1000 Int$ | +7.4% |
| 2016 | 9,413 1000 Int$ | -13.1% |
| 2017 | 9,430 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
| 2018 | 9,371 1000 Int$ | -0.6% |
| 2019 | 9,239 1000 Int$ | -1.4% |
| 2020 | 9,214 1000 Int$ | -0.3% |
| 2021 | 9,085 1000 Int$ | -1.4% |
| 2022 | 9,285 1000 Int$ | +2.2% |
| 2023 | 9,249 1000 Int$ | -0.4% |
| 2024 | 9,331 1000 Int$ | +0.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 34,165 1000 Int$ | 25,962 1000 Int$ | 45,806 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 18,484 1000 Int$ | 14,113 1000 Int$ | 29,075 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 11,528 1000 Int$ | 10,922 1000 Int$ | 12,321 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 10,312 1000 Int$ | 7,770 1000 Int$ | 16,576 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 14,451 1000 Int$ | 9,384 1000 Int$ | 21,548 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 11,062 1000 Int$ | 9,239 1000 Int$ | 14,559 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 9,233 1000 Int$ | 9,085 1000 Int$ | 9,331 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
- 1 India 62,536 1000 Int$ compare
- 2 Russian Federation 30,881 1000 Int$ compare
- 3 USSR 26,094 1000 Int$ compare
- 4 China 13,651 1000 Int$ compare
- 4 China, mainland 13,651 1000 Int$ compare
- 5 Democratic Republic of the Congo 4,808 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
- Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested, annual growth rate -0.1757 % change on previous year (2024)
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate -0.0067 % change on previous year (2024)
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Yield, annual growth rate 2.24 % change on previous year (2024)
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Production, annual growth rate 2.23 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sheep and Goat Meat — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sheep and Goat Meat — Production, annual growth rate 3.86 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sheep and Goat Meat — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth 1.02 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sheep and Goats — Stocks, annual growth rate 2.5 % change on previous year (2024)
- Cabbages — Area harvested, annual growth rate 1.26 % change on previous year (2024)
- Vegetables Primary — Production, annual growth rate 1.94 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross in Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) was 9,331 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross recorded in Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- The highest recorded value was 45,806 1000 Int$ in 1967.
- What is the lowest kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross recorded in Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- The lowest recorded value was 7,770 1000 Int$ in 1992.
- How does Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank for kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross?
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd out of 5 groups with data for 2024.
- Is kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross rising or falling in Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 7.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Least Developed Countries (LDCs) data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.