Jute — Stock Variation in Asia
Asia: Jute — Stock Variation was -500 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile
Jute — Stock Variation in Asia, 1961–2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
In 2013, jute — stock variation in Asia stood at -500 t.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 13.6% on the previous year and up 49.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, jute — stock variation in Asia peaked at 18,650 t in 1988 and was at its lowest, -14,800 t, in 1986.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Jute — Stock Variation in Asia, year by year
| Year | t | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 t | — |
| 1962 | 0 t | — |
| 1963 | 0 t | — |
| 1964 | 0 t | — |
| 1965 | 0 t | — |
| 1966 | 0 t | — |
| 1967 | 0 t | — |
| 1968 | 0 t | — |
| 1969 | 0 t | — |
| 1970 | 0 t | — |
| 1971 | 0 t | — |
| 1972 | 0 t | — |
| 1973 | 0 t | — |
| 1974 | 0 t | — |
| 1975 | 0 t | — |
| 1976 | -500 t | — |
| 1977 | -3,000 t | +500.0% |
| 1978 | -2,150 t | -28.3% |
| 1979 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 1980 | 0 t | — |
| 1981 | 1,050 t | — |
| 1982 | 900 t | -14.3% |
| 1983 | 150 t | -83.3% |
| 1984 | 70 t | -53.3% |
| 1985 | -9,900 t | -14242.9% |
| 1986 | -14,800 t | +49.5% |
| 1987 | -4,750 t | -67.9% |
| 1988 | 18,650 t | -492.6% |
| 1989 | -870 t | -104.7% |
| 1990 | 11,300 t | -1398.9% |
| 1991 | 2,400 t | -78.8% |
| 1992 | 100 t | -95.8% |
| 1993 | 200 t | +100.0% |
| 1994 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 1995 | 100 t | — |
| 1996 | 390 t | +290.0% |
| 1997 | -640 t | -264.1% |
| 1998 | 1,300 t | -303.1% |
| 1999 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 2000 | 0 t | — |
| 2001 | -330 t | — |
| 2002 | 20 t | -106.1% |
| 2003 | -990 t | -5050.0% |
| 2004 | 1,000 t | -201.0% |
| 2005 | -400 t | -140.0% |
| 2006 | -1,650 t | +312.5% |
| 2007 | -500 t | -69.7% |
| 2008 | -500 t | -0.0% |
| 2009 | 3,050 t | -710.0% |
| 2010 | 0 t | -100.0% |
| 2011 | -760 t | — |
| 2012 | -440 t | -42.1% |
| 2013 | -500 t | +13.6% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Jute — Stock Variation in Asia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1985 | -14242.9% | 70 t | -9,900 t |
| 2003 | -5050.0% | 20 t | -990 t |
| 1990 | +1398.9% | -870 t | 11,300 t |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | 9 |
| 1970s | -565 t | -3,000 t | 0 t | 10 |
| 1980s | -950 t | -14,800 t | 18,650 t | 10 |
| 1990s | 1,515 t | -640 t | 11,300 t | 10 |
| 2000s | -30 t | -1,650 t | 3,050 t | 10 |
| 2010s | -425 t | -760 t | 0 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Asia
- 1 Ghana 150 t compare
- 1 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 0 t compare
- 1 United Republic of Tanzania 0 t compare
- 2 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 20 t compare
- 3 Belarus 0 t compare
- 3 Belgium-Luxembourg 0 t compare
- 3 Bulgaria 0 t compare
- 3 Cambodia 0 t compare
- 3 Canada 0 t compare
- 3 China, Taiwan Province of 0 t compare
- 3 Denmark 0 t compare
- 3 Eswatini 0 t compare
- 3 Finland 0 t compare
- 3 France 0 t compare
- 3 Gambia 0 t compare
- 3 Honduras 0 t compare
- 3 Indonesia 0 t compare
- 3 Ireland 0 t compare
- 3 Italy 0 t compare
- 3 Jamaica 0 t compare
- 3 Kazakhstan 0 t compare
- 3 Kenya 0 t compare
- 3 Kyrgyzstan 0 t compare
- 3 Lebanon 0 t compare
- 3 Lithuania 0 t compare
- 3 Malawi 0 t compare
- 3 Mexico 0 t compare
- 3 Morocco 0 t compare
- 3 Nepal 0 t compare
- 3 New Zealand 0 t compare
- 3 Nicaragua 0 t compare
- 3 Norway 0 t compare
- 3 Panama 0 t compare
- 3 Philippines 0 t compare
- 3 Portugal 0 t compare
- 3 Russian Federation 0 t compare
- 3 South Africa 0 t compare
- 3 Spain 0 t compare
- 3 Sweden 0 t compare
- 3 T�rkiye 0 t compare
- 3 Uganda 0 t compare
- 3 Ukraine 0 t compare
- 3 United Arab Emirates 0 t compare
- 3 Zambia 0 t compare
- 3 Australia and New Zealand 0 t compare
- 6 Caribbean 0 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for Asia
- Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, annual growth rate 2.86 % change on previous year (2024)
- Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual -2.8 % change on previous year (2024)
- Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing -0.8067 % change on previous year (2024)
- Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual -0.0343 % change on previous year (2024)
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing 0.1138 % change on previous year (2024)
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual 2.03 % change on previous year (2024)
- Chickens — Stocks, annual growth rate 1.79 % change on previous year (2024)
- Cattle fat, unrendered — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth 0.1138 % change on previous year (2024)
- Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) 1.17 % change on previous year (2024)
- Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) 0.7475 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is jute — stock variation in Asia?
- Jute — stock variation in Asia was -500 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest jute — stock variation recorded in Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 18,650 t in 1988.
- What is the lowest jute — stock variation recorded in Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was -14,800 t in 1986.
- How does Asia rank for jute — stock variation?
- Asia ranks 4th out of 4 groups with data for 2013.
- Is jute — stock variation rising or falling in Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 49.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Jute — Stock Variation. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.