Fruit Primary — Production, per square kilometre in Belarus
Belarus: Fruit Primary — Production, per square kilometre was 2.62 t per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Fruit Primary — Production, per square kilometre in Belarus, 1992–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for fruit primary — production, per square kilometre in Belarus is 2.62 t per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of up 0.3% on the previous year and up 14.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, fruit primary — production, per square kilometre in Belarus peaked at 4.61 t per square kilometre in 2018 and was at its lowest, 0.9377 t per square kilometre, in 1999.
Belarus ranks 119th of 170 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 32 years of available data.
Fruit Primary — Production, per square kilometre in Belarus, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 2.36 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 3.97 t per square kilometre | +68.2% |
| 1994 | 1.94 t per square kilometre | -51.0% |
| 1995 | 1.89 t per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 1996 | 2.16 t per square kilometre | +14.5% |
| 1997 | 1.79 t per square kilometre | -17.1% |
| 1998 | 0.9974 t per square kilometre | -44.3% |
| 1999 | 0.9377 t per square kilometre | -6.0% |
| 2000 | 1.47 t per square kilometre | +57.2% |
| 2001 | 1.55 t per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2002 | 2.36 t per square kilometre | +52.1% |
| 2003 | 1.19 t per square kilometre | -49.7% |
| 2004 | 1.76 t per square kilometre | +48.7% |
| 2005 | 1.88 t per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 2006 | 3.55 t per square kilometre | +88.9% |
| 2007 | 2.11 t per square kilometre | -40.7% |
| 2008 | 3 t per square kilometre | +42.3% |
| 2009 | 3.45 t per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 2010 | 3.99 t per square kilometre | +15.8% |
| 2011 | 1.73 t per square kilometre | -56.6% |
| 2012 | 3.05 t per square kilometre | +76.0% |
| 2013 | 2.29 t per square kilometre | -24.8% |
| 2014 | 3.14 t per square kilometre | +37.2% |
| 2015 | 2.79 t per square kilometre | -11.4% |
| 2016 | 3.44 t per square kilometre | +23.6% |
| 2017 | 2.28 t per square kilometre | -33.9% |
| 2018 | 4.61 t per square kilometre | +102.6% |
| 2019 | 2.56 t per square kilometre | -44.6% |
| 2020 | 3.81 t per square kilometre | +49.2% |
| 2021 | 2.66 t per square kilometre | -30.1% |
| 2022 | 2.61 t per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2023 | 2.62 t per square kilometre | +0.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.01 t per square kilometre | 0.9377 t per square kilometre | 3.97 t per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 2.23 t per square kilometre | 1.19 t per square kilometre | 3.55 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.99 t per square kilometre | 1.73 t per square kilometre | 4.61 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.93 t per square kilometre | 2.61 t per square kilometre | 3.81 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 116 Argentina 2.69 t per square kilometre compare
- 117 Czechia 2.66 t per square kilometre compare
- 118 Zimbabwe 2.63 t per square kilometre compare
- 120 Equatorial Guinea 2.6 t per square kilometre compare
- 121 Uruguay 2.45 t per square kilometre compare
- 122 Turkmenistan 2.36 t per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Belarus
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 16.45 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.069 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 709.2 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -2.13 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2051 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.9% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.9% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.6% (2021)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.3% (2021)
Frequently asked questions
- What is fruit primary — production, per square kilometre in Belarus?
- Fruit primary — production, per square kilometre in Belarus was 2.62 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest fruit primary — production, per square kilometre recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 4.61 t per square kilometre in 2018.
- What is the lowest fruit primary — production, per square kilometre recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.9377 t per square kilometre in 1999.
- How does Belarus rank for fruit primary — production, per square kilometre?
- Belarus ranks 119th out of 170 countries with data for 2023.
- Is fruit primary — production, per square kilometre rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 14.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Fruit Primary — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Fruit Primary — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Fruit Primary — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Fruit Primary — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Fruit Primary — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.