Fat of pigs — Production, per square kilometre in Dominican Republic

Dominican Republic: Fat of pigs — Production, per square kilometre was 0.1466 t per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0.1466 t per square kilometre
Change on year
down 11.8%
World rank
28th
of 150 countries
All-time high
0.2488 t per square kilometre
in 2002
All-time low
0.0008 t per square kilometre
in 1982
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Fat of pigs — Production, per square kilometre in Dominican Republic, 1961–2023

00.050.10.150.20.25196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.

Analysis

Dominican Republic recorded 0.1466 t per square kilometre for fat of pigs — production, per square kilometre in 2023.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 11.8% on the previous year and down 18.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fat of pigs — production, per square kilometre in Dominican Republic peaked at 0.2488 t per square kilometre in 2002 and was at its lowest, 0.0008 t per square kilometre, in 1982.

That places Dominican Republic 28th out of 150 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Fat of pigs — Production, per square kilometre in Dominican Republic, year by year

Annual values for Fat of pigs — Production, per square kilometre in Dominican Republic, 1961 to 2023.
Year t per square kilometre Change
1961 0.0208 t per square kilometre
1962 0.022 t per square kilometre +5.4%
1963 0.0208 t per square kilometre -5.2%
1964 0.0204 t per square kilometre -2.2%
1965 0.0197 t per square kilometre -3.3%
1966 0.0224 t per square kilometre +13.8%
1967 0.0217 t per square kilometre -3.0%
1968 0.0245 t per square kilometre +12.5%
1969 0.0234 t per square kilometre -4.2%
1970 0.0249 t per square kilometre +6.3%
1971 0.0317 t per square kilometre +27.3%
1972 0.0362 t per square kilometre +14.3%
1973 0.0387 t per square kilometre +6.9%
1974 0.0408 t per square kilometre +5.3%
1975 0.043 t per square kilometre +5.6%
1976 0.0475 t per square kilometre +10.5%
1977 0.0509 t per square kilometre +7.1%
1978 0.0514 t per square kilometre +0.9%
1979 0.0521 t per square kilometre +1.3%
1980 0.026 t per square kilometre -50.0%
1981 0.0011 t per square kilometre -95.7%
1982 0.0008 t per square kilometre -30.4%
1983 0.0044 t per square kilometre +456.1%
1984 0.0153 t per square kilometre +249.9%
1985 0.0294 t per square kilometre +92.0%
1986 0.0317 t per square kilometre +7.7%
1987 0.0374 t per square kilometre +17.9%
1988 0.0396 t per square kilometre +6.1%
1989 0.0453 t per square kilometre +14.3%
1990 0.0469 t per square kilometre +3.5%
1991 0.0299 t per square kilometre -36.2%
1992 0.0355 t per square kilometre +18.9%
1993 0.0359 t per square kilometre +1.2%
1994 0.0407 t per square kilometre +13.1%
1995 0.1299 t per square kilometre +219.4%
1996 0.1358 t per square kilometre +4.5%
1997 0.1399 t per square kilometre +3.0%
1998 0.1449 t per square kilometre +3.6%
1999 0.1305 t per square kilometre -9.9%
2000 0.1385 t per square kilometre +6.1%
2001 0.2237 t per square kilometre +61.5%
2002 0.2488 t per square kilometre +11.2%
2003 0.2058 t per square kilometre -17.3%
2004 0.1593 t per square kilometre -22.6%
2005 0.1971 t per square kilometre +23.7%
2006 0.2292 t per square kilometre +16.3%
2007 0.2181 t per square kilometre -4.8%
2008 0.1932 t per square kilometre -11.4%
2009 0.192 t per square kilometre -0.6%
2010 0.1531 t per square kilometre -20.2%
2011 0.2362 t per square kilometre +54.3%
2012 0.1771 t per square kilometre -25.0%
2013 0.179 t per square kilometre +1.1%
2014 0.1654 t per square kilometre -7.6%
2015 0.1679 t per square kilometre +1.5%
2016 0.1712 t per square kilometre +2.0%
2017 0.175 t per square kilometre +2.2%
2018 0.172 t per square kilometre -1.7%
2019 0.1814 t per square kilometre +5.5%
2020 0.1834 t per square kilometre +1.1%
2021 0.2288 t per square kilometre +24.8%
2022 0.1662 t per square kilometre -27.4%
2023 0.1466 t per square kilometre -11.8%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0.0217 t per square kilometre 0.0197 t per square kilometre 0.0245 t per square kilometre 9
1970s 0.0417 t per square kilometre 0.0249 t per square kilometre 0.0521 t per square kilometre 10
1980s 0.0231 t per square kilometre 0.0008 t per square kilometre 0.0453 t per square kilometre 10
1990s 0.087 t per square kilometre 0.0299 t per square kilometre 0.1449 t per square kilometre 10
2000s 0.2006 t per square kilometre 0.1385 t per square kilometre 0.2488 t per square kilometre 10
2010s 0.1778 t per square kilometre 0.1531 t per square kilometre 0.2362 t per square kilometre 10
2020s 0.1812 t per square kilometre 0.1466 t per square kilometre 0.2288 t per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Dominican Republic

  1. 25 Italy 0.2009 t per square kilometre compare
  2. 26 Grenada 0.1697 t per square kilometre compare
  3. 27 Cyprus 0.1514 t per square kilometre compare
  4. 29 Slovakia 0.1417 t per square kilometre compare
  5. 30 France 0.14 t per square kilometre compare
  6. 31 Belarus 0.1313 t per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 151 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Dominican Republic

All data for Dominican Republic →

Frequently asked questions

What is fat of pigs — production, per square kilometre in Dominican Republic?
Fat of pigs — production, per square kilometre in Dominican Republic was 0.1466 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest fat of pigs — production, per square kilometre recorded in Dominican Republic?
The highest recorded value was 0.2488 t per square kilometre in 2002.
What is the lowest fat of pigs — production, per square kilometre recorded in Dominican Republic?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0008 t per square kilometre in 1982.
How does Dominican Republic rank for fat of pigs — production, per square kilometre?
Dominican Republic ranks 28th out of 150 countries with data for 2023.
Is fat of pigs — production, per square kilometre rising or falling in Dominican Republic?
Over the last ten years it is down 18.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Dominican Republic data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Fat of pigs — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Fat of pigs — Production, per square kilometre in Dominican Republic. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fat-of-pigs-production-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fat-of-pigs-production-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/">Fat of pigs — Production, per square kilometre in Dominican Republic</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Fat of pigs — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Fat of pigs — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Fat of pigs — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,533 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Fat of pigs — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.