Fat of pigs — Production, per square kilometre in Belarus
Belarus: Fat of pigs — Production, per square kilometre was 0.1313 t per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Fat of pigs — Production, per square kilometre in Belarus, 1992–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, fat of pigs — production, per square kilometre in Belarus stood at 0.1313 t per square kilometre.
The figure is up 3.6% on the previous year and down 20.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, fat of pigs — production, per square kilometre in Belarus peaked at 0.1642 t per square kilometre in 2013 and was at its lowest, 0.0882 t per square kilometre, in 1994.
That places Belarus 31st out of 150 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 32 years of available data.
Fat of pigs — Production, per square kilometre in Belarus, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0.1131 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 0.0994 t per square kilometre | -12.1% |
| 1994 | 0.0882 t per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 1995 | 0.092 t per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1996 | 0.0956 t per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1997 | 0.1042 t per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 1998 | 0.112 t per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1999 | 0.1088 t per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 2000 | 0.1056 t per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 2001 | 0.1063 t per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2002 | 0.1053 t per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 2003 | 0.1053 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.1047 t per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2005 | 0.1124 t per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 2006 | 0.1211 t per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 2007 | 0.1302 t per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 2008 | 0.1317 t per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2009 | 0.1359 t per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2010 | 0.1395 t per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2011 | 0.1468 t per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2012 | 0.1551 t per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 2013 | 0.1642 t per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2014 | 0.1261 t per square kilometre | -23.2% |
| 2015 | 0.1266 t per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2016 | 0.1346 t per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 2017 | 0.1399 t per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2018 | 0.1391 t per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 2019 | 0.134 t per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 2020 | 0.1397 t per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2021 | 0.1374 t per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2022 | 0.1268 t per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 2023 | 0.1313 t per square kilometre | +3.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1017 t per square kilometre | 0.0882 t per square kilometre | 0.1131 t per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 0.1159 t per square kilometre | 0.1047 t per square kilometre | 0.1359 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.1406 t per square kilometre | 0.1261 t per square kilometre | 0.1642 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.1338 t per square kilometre | 0.1268 t per square kilometre | 0.1397 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 28 Dominican Republic 0.1466 t per square kilometre compare
- 29 Slovakia 0.1417 t per square kilometre compare
- 30 France 0.14 t per square kilometre compare
- 32 Haiti 0.1165 t per square kilometre compare
- 33 Ecuador 0.1033 t per square kilometre compare
- 34 Jamaica 0.0926 t per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Belarus
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 16.45 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.069 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 709.2 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -2.13 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2051 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.9% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.9% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.6% (2021)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.3% (2021)
Frequently asked questions
- What is fat of pigs — production, per square kilometre in Belarus?
- Fat of pigs — production, per square kilometre in Belarus was 0.1313 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest fat of pigs — production, per square kilometre recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 0.1642 t per square kilometre in 2013.
- What is the lowest fat of pigs — production, per square kilometre recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0882 t per square kilometre in 1994.
- How does Belarus rank for fat of pigs — production, per square kilometre?
- Belarus ranks 31st out of 150 countries with data for 2023.
- Is fat of pigs — production, per square kilometre rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 20.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Fat of pigs — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Fat of pigs — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Fat of pigs — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Fat of pigs — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Fat of pigs — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.