FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value in Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value was 477.05 1000 No in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
477.05 1000 No
Change on year
up 1.8%
World rank
47th
of 125 countries
All-time high
483.62 1000 No
in 2021
All-time low
209.47 1000 No
in 2000
Years of data
24
2000–2023

FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value in Zimbabwe, 2000–2023

01002003004005002000201120232000: 209.5 1000 No2001: 222.6 1000 No2002: 224 1000 No2003: 226 1000 No2004: 231.6 1000 No2005: 226.9 1000 No2006: 232 1000 No2007: 235.9 1000 No2008: 223 1000 No2009: 233.8 1000 No2010: 254.7 1000 No2011: 250.3 1000 No2012: 261.7 1000 No2013: 273.8 1000 No2014: 285.5 1000 No2015: 296.8 1000 No2016: 307.7 1000 No2017: 319.3 1000 No2018: 330.2 1000 No2019: 341.4 1000 No2020: 413.6 1000 No2021: 483.6 1000 No2022: 468.8 1000 No2023: 477.1 1000 No

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 No.

Analysis

In 2023, fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value in Zimbabwe stood at 477.05 1000 No.

That represents a change of up 1.8% on the previous year and up 74.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value in Zimbabwe peaked at 483.62 1000 No in 2021 and was at its lowest, 209.47 1000 No, in 2000.

That places Zimbabwe 47th out of 125 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 24 years of available data.

FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value in Zimbabwe, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value in Zimbabwe, 2000 to 2023.
Year 1000 No Change
2000 209.47 1000 No
2001 222.58 1000 No +6.3%
2002 223.96 1000 No +0.6%
2003 225.99 1000 No +0.9%
2004 231.58 1000 No +2.5%
2005 226.93 1000 No -2.0%
2006 231.97 1000 No +2.2%
2007 235.94 1000 No +1.7%
2008 222.99 1000 No -5.5%
2009 233.77 1000 No +4.8%
2010 254.72 1000 No +9.0%
2011 250.32 1000 No -1.7%
2012 261.72 1000 No +4.6%
2013 273.78 1000 No +4.6%
2014 285.5 1000 No +4.3%
2015 296.79 1000 No +4.0%
2016 307.72 1000 No +3.7%
2017 319.3 1000 No +3.8%
2018 330.18 1000 No +3.4%
2019 341.45 1000 No +3.4%
2020 413.63 1000 No +21.1%
2021 483.62 1000 No +16.9%
2022 468.75 1000 No -3.1%
2023 477.05 1000 No +1.8%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 226.52 1000 No 209.47 1000 No 235.94 1000 No 10
2010s 292.15 1000 No 250.32 1000 No 341.45 1000 No 10
2020s 460.76 1000 No 413.63 1000 No 483.62 1000 No 4

Countries ranked near Zimbabwe

  1. 44 Romania 510.84 1000 No compare
  2. 45 Papua New Guinea 484.49 1000 No compare
  3. 46 Chile 482.31 1000 No compare
  4. 48 Honduras 445.13 1000 No compare
  5. 49 Sri Lanka 443.11 1000 No compare
  6. 50 El Salvador 428.8 1000 No compare

See the full ranking of 171 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Zimbabwe

All data for Zimbabwe →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value in Zimbabwe?
Fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value in Zimbabwe was 477.05 1000 No in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value recorded in Zimbabwe?
The highest recorded value was 483.62 1000 No in 2021.
What is the lowest fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value recorded in Zimbabwe?
The lowest recorded value was 209.47 1000 No in 2000.
How does Zimbabwe rank for fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value?
Zimbabwe ranks 47th out of 125 countries with data for 2023.
Is fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
Over the last ten years it is up 74.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value in Zimbabwe. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-female-value/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-female-value/zimbabwe/">FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value in Zimbabwe</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.