Chile vs Zimbabwe: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value

Chile
482.31 1000 No
in 2023
Zimbabwe
477.05 1000 No
in 2023
Chile rank
46th
Zimbabwe rank
47th

FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value over time

  • Chile
  • Zimbabwe
0200400600200020112023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 482.31 1000 No against 477.05 1000 No in Zimbabwe, a difference of 5.26 1000 No.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 47th of 125 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 409.64 1000 No 226.52 1000 No 183.13 1000 No Chile
2010s 492.31 1000 No 292.15 1000 No 200.16 1000 No Chile
2020s 453.95 1000 No 460.76 1000 No 6.81 1000 No Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value, Chile or Zimbabwe?
Chile, at 482.31 1000 No against 477.05 1000 No in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value between Chile and Zimbabwe?
5.26 1000 No, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Zimbabwe?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Chile and Zimbabwe rank globally for fao model — total non-agricultural afs employment — female — value?
Chile ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 47th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Zimbabwe: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-female-value/chile/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-total-non-agricultural-afs-employment-female-value/chile/zimbabwe/">Chile vs Zimbabwe: FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Total non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.