FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in United States of America

United States of America: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS was 82.03 % in 2023. ▬ Flat

Latest (2023)
82.03 %
Change on year
up 0.4%
Rank
2nd
of 31 groups
All-time high
82.03 %
in 2023
All-time low
77.2 %
in 2000
Years of data
24
2000–2023

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in United States of America, 2000–2023

0204060802000201120232000: 77.2 %2001: 77.3 %2002: 77.7 %2003: 79.7 %2004: 79.9 %2005: 80.3 %2006: 80.3 %2007: 80.8 %2008: 80.5 %2009: 80.9 %2010: 80.1 %2011: 80.2 %2012: 81.1 %2013: 81.4 %2014: 80.4 %2015: 79.5 %2016: 79.6 %2017: 79.3 %2018: 79.8 %2019: 80.5 %2020: 79.9 %2021: 81 %2022: 81.7 %2023: 82 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

United States of America recorded 82.03 % for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in 2023. That is the highest value across all 24 years on record.

The figure is up 0.4% on the previous year and up 0.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in United States of America peaked at 82.03 % in 2023 and was at its lowest, 77.2 %, in 2000.

That places United States of America 2nd out of 31 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in United States of America, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value in United States of America, 2000 to 2023.
Year % Change
2000 77.2 %
2001 77.3 % +0.1%
2002 77.68 % +0.5%
2003 79.7 % +2.6%
2004 79.89 % +0.2%
2005 80.34 % +0.6%
2006 80.32 % -0.0%
2007 80.79 % +0.6%
2008 80.5 % -0.4%
2009 80.9 % +0.5%
2010 80.12 % -1.0%
2011 80.23 % +0.1%
2012 81.12 % +1.1%
2013 81.38 % +0.3%
2014 80.38 % -1.2%
2015 79.45 % -1.2%
2016 79.57 % +0.2%
2017 79.34 % -0.3%
2018 79.82 % +0.6%
2019 80.47 % +0.8%
2020 79.9 % -0.7%
2021 81.05 % +1.4%
2022 81.69 % +0.8%
2023 82.03 % +0.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 79.46 % 77.2 % 80.9 % 10
2010s 80.19 % 79.34 % 81.38 % 10
2020s 81.17 % 79.9 % 82.03 % 4

Countries ranked near United States of America

  1. 1 Canada 89.48 % compare
  2. 1 Türkiye 55.46 % compare
  3. 2 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 48.07 % compare
  4. 2 Malta 86.74 % compare
  5. 3 Belgium 86.49 % compare
  6. 3 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 40.55 % compare
  7. 4 Brunei Darussalam 86.21 % compare
  8. 4 Micronesia 34.58 % compare
  9. 5 Israel 85.77 % compare
  10. 5 Viet Nam 31.32 % compare

See the full ranking of 171 places →

More agriculture & rural data for United States of America

All data for United States of America →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in United States of America?
Fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in United States of America was 82.03 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs recorded in United States of America?
The highest recorded value was 82.03 % in 2023.
What is the lowest fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs recorded in United States of America?
The lowest recorded value was 77.2 % in 2000.
How does United States of America rank for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs?
United States of America ranks 2nd out of 31 groups with data for 2023.
Is fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs rising or falling in United States of America?
Over the last ten years it is up 0.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this United States of America data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in United States of America. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-male-value/united-states-of-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-male-value/united-states-of-america/">FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in United States of America</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.