FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in United States of America

United States of America: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS was 90.42 % in 2023. ▬ Flat

Latest (2023)
90.42 %
Change on year
up 0.3%
Rank
2nd
of 31 groups
All-time high
91.87 %
in 2013
All-time low
89.25 %
in 2020
Years of data
24
2000–2023

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in United States of America, 2000–2023

0204060801002000201120232000: 89.9 %2001: 90 %2002: 89.9 %2003: 90.1 %2004: 90.6 %2005: 90.8 %2006: 91 %2007: 91.8 %2008: 91.7 %2009: 91.7 %2010: 90.8 %2011: 90.7 %2012: 90.9 %2013: 91.9 %2014: 91.6 %2015: 90.8 %2016: 90.8 %2017: 91 %2018: 90.9 %2019: 91 %2020: 89.2 %2021: 90.1 %2022: 90.1 %2023: 90.4 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

In 2023, fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in United States of America stood at 90.42 %.

That represents a change of up 0.3% on the previous year and down 1.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in United States of America peaked at 91.87 % in 2013 and was at its lowest, 89.25 %, in 2020.

United States of America ranks 2nd of 31 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in United States of America, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value in United States of America, 2000 to 2023.
Year % Change
2000 89.92 %
2001 90 % +0.1%
2002 89.9 % -0.1%
2003 90.11 % +0.2%
2004 90.6 % +0.5%
2005 90.85 % +0.3%
2006 91 % +0.2%
2007 91.79 % +0.9%
2008 91.66 % -0.1%
2009 91.72 % +0.1%
2010 90.81 % -1.0%
2011 90.68 % -0.1%
2012 90.88 % +0.2%
2013 91.87 % +1.1%
2014 91.62 % -0.3%
2015 90.82 % -0.9%
2016 90.85 % +0.0%
2017 90.99 % +0.2%
2018 90.92 % -0.1%
2019 90.96 % +0.0%
2020 89.25 % -1.9%
2021 90.06 % +0.9%
2022 90.13 % +0.1%
2023 90.42 % +0.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 90.75 % 89.9 % 91.79 % 10
2010s 91.04 % 90.68 % 91.87 % 10
2020s 89.97 % 89.25 % 90.42 % 4

Countries ranked near United States of America

  1. 1 United Arab Emirates 97.71 % compare
  2. 1 Micronesia 79.65 % compare
  3. 2 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 57.43 % compare
  4. 2 Canada 93.34 % compare
  5. 3 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 54.69 % compare
  6. 3 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 93.28 % compare
  7. 4 Malta 92.89 % compare
  8. 4 Polynesia 49.3 % compare
  9. 5 Brunei Darussalam 92.6 % compare
  10. 5 Viet Nam 44.02 % compare

See the full ranking of 171 places →

More agriculture & rural data for United States of America

All data for United States of America →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in United States of America?
Fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in United States of America was 90.42 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs recorded in United States of America?
The highest recorded value was 91.87 % in 2013.
What is the lowest fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs recorded in United States of America?
The lowest recorded value was 89.25 % in 2020.
How does United States of America rank for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs?
United States of America ranks 2nd out of 31 groups with data for 2023.
Is fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs rising or falling in United States of America?
Over the last ten years it is down 1.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this United States of America data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in United States of America. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/united-states-of-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/united-states-of-america/">FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in United States of America</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.