FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Brazil

Brazil: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS was 78.88 % in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
78.88 %
Change on year
up 2.4%
World rank
37th
of 125 countries
All-time high
78.88 %
in 2023
All-time low
63.23 %
in 2002
Years of data
24
2000–2023

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Brazil, 2000–2023

0204060802000201120232000: 67.2 %2001: 64.2 %2002: 63.2 %2003: 64.4 %2004: 64.9 %2005: 65 %2006: 65.9 %2007: 67.8 %2008: 68.9 %2009: 70.6 %2010: 72.1 %2011: 73.2 %2012: 70.8 %2013: 70.9 %2014: 73.1 %2015: 73.9 %2016: 73.6 %2017: 76.6 %2018: 77 %2019: 77.7 %2020: 75 %2021: 74 %2022: 77 %2023: 78.9 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

The most recent figure for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in Brazil is 78.88 %, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 24 years on record.

That represents a change of up 2.4% on the previous year and up 11.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in Brazil peaked at 78.88 % in 2023 and was at its lowest, 63.23 %, in 2002.

That places Brazil 37th out of 125 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 24 years of available data.

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Brazil, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value in Brazil, 2000 to 2023.
Year % Change
2000 67.23 %
2001 64.25 % -4.4%
2002 63.23 % -1.6%
2003 64.4 % +1.9%
2004 64.88 % +0.7%
2005 64.95 % +0.1%
2006 65.91 % +1.5%
2007 67.8 % +2.9%
2008 68.93 % +1.7%
2009 70.6 % +2.4%
2010 72.13 % +2.2%
2011 73.23 % +1.5%
2012 70.84 % -3.3%
2013 70.93 % +0.1%
2014 73.08 % +3.0%
2015 73.89 % +1.1%
2016 73.63 % -0.4%
2017 76.57 % +4.0%
2018 77.05 % +0.6%
2019 77.65 % +0.8%
2020 75.02 % -3.4%
2021 73.97 % -1.4%
2022 77.05 % +4.2%
2023 78.88 % +2.4%

Brazil compared with similar countries

  • Brazil's 78.88 % is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 59.2 %, 1.3× the median. (32 countries reporting)
  • Brazil's 78.88 % is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 77.11 %, 1.0× the median. (17 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 66.22 % 63.23 % 70.6 % 10
2010s 73.9 % 70.84 % 77.65 % 10
2020s 76.23 % 73.97 % 78.88 % 4

Countries ranked near Brazil

  1. 34 Hungary 79.6 % compare
  2. 35 Croatia 79.32 % compare
  3. 36 Republic of Korea 79.02 % compare
  4. 38 Iceland 78.83 % compare
  5. 39 Guyana 78.59 % compare
  6. 39 Switzerland 78.59 % compare

See the full ranking of 171 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Brazil

All data for Brazil →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in Brazil?
Fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in Brazil was 78.88 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs recorded in Brazil?
The highest recorded value was 78.88 % in 2023.
What is the lowest fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs recorded in Brazil?
The lowest recorded value was 63.23 % in 2002.
How does Brazil rank for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs?
Brazil ranks 37th out of 125 countries with data for 2023.
Is fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs rising or falling in Brazil?
Over the last ten years it is up 11.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Brazil data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Brazil. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/brazil/">FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Brazil</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.