Brazil vs Guyana: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS over time
- Brazil
- Guyana
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 78.88 % against 78.59 % in Guyana, a difference of 0.29 %.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Guyana ahead.
Brazil ranks 37th and Guyana ranks 39th of 125 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Guyana in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.22 % | 71.6 % | 5.39 % | Guyana |
| 2010s | 73.9 % | 70.59 % | 3.31 % | Brazil |
| 2020s | 75.35 % | 76.61 % | 1.27 % | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs, Brazil or Guyana?
- Brazil, at 78.88 % against 78.59 % in Guyana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs between Brazil and Guyana?
- 0.29 %, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Guyana?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Brazil and Guyana rank globally for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs?
- Brazil ranks 37th and Guyana ranks 39th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.