FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Botswana

Botswana: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS was 59.55 % in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
59.55 %
Change on year
up 6.7%
World rank
65th
of 125 countries
All-time high
59.55 %
in 2023
All-time low
39.33 %
in 2000
Years of data
24
2000–2023

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Botswana, 2000–2023

02040602000201120232000: 39.3 %2001: 56.4 %2002: 53.8 %2003: 51.4 %2004: 47.9 %2005: 45.6 %2006: 52.1 %2007: 50.1 %2008: 48.2 %2009: 46.4 %2010: 46.6 %2011: 45.4 %2012: 44.3 %2013: 46.3 %2014: 48 %2015: 48.8 %2016: 50.5 %2017: 51.8 %2018: 52.9 %2019: 54.2 %2020: 44.2 %2021: 48 %2022: 55.8 %2023: 59.5 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

Botswana recorded 59.55 % for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in 2023. That is the highest value across all 24 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 6.7% on the previous year and up 28.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in Botswana peaked at 59.55 % in 2023 and was at its lowest, 39.33 %, in 2000.

That places Botswana 65th out of 125 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 24 years of available data.

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Botswana, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value in Botswana, 2000 to 2023.
Year % Change
2000 39.33 %
2001 56.41 % +43.4%
2002 53.81 % -4.6%
2003 51.42 % -4.4%
2004 47.9 % -6.8%
2005 45.64 % -4.7%
2006 52.13 % +14.2%
2007 50.11 % -3.9%
2008 48.2 % -3.8%
2009 46.41 % -3.7%
2010 46.65 % +0.5%
2011 45.38 % -2.7%
2012 44.33 % -2.3%
2013 46.29 % +4.4%
2014 48.01 % +3.7%
2015 48.78 % +1.6%
2016 50.55 % +3.6%
2017 51.84 % +2.6%
2018 52.94 % +2.1%
2019 54.19 % +2.4%
2020 44.23 % -18.4%
2021 47.95 % +8.4%
2022 55.82 % +16.4%
2023 59.55 % +6.7%

Botswana compared with similar countries

  • Botswana's 59.55 % is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 59.2 %, 1.0× the median. (32 countries reporting)
  • Botswana's 59.55 % is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 28.44 %, 2.1× the median. (34 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 49.14 % 39.33 % 56.41 % 10
2010s 48.9 % 44.33 % 54.19 % 10
2020s 51.89 % 44.23 % 59.55 % 4

Countries ranked near Botswana

  1. 62 Romania 62.03 % compare
  2. 63 Greece 61.63 % compare
  3. 64 Poland 59.79 % compare
  4. 66 Philippines 58.86 % compare
  5. 67 Peru 56.74 % compare
  6. 68 Senegal 56.63 % compare

See the full ranking of 171 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Botswana

All data for Botswana →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in Botswana?
Fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in Botswana was 59.55 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs recorded in Botswana?
The highest recorded value was 59.55 % in 2023.
What is the lowest fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs recorded in Botswana?
The lowest recorded value was 39.33 % in 2000.
How does Botswana rank for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs?
Botswana ranks 65th out of 125 countries with data for 2023.
Is fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs rising or falling in Botswana?
Over the last ten years it is up 28.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Botswana data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Botswana. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/botswana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/botswana/">FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Botswana</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.