FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Australia and New Zealand

Australia and New Zealand: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS was 84.85 % in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
84.85 %
Change on year
down 1.4%
World rank
21st
of 125 countries
All-time high
86.04 %
in 2017
All-time low
78.36 %
in 2001
Years of data
24
2000–2023

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Australia and New Zealand, 2000–2023

0204060802000201120232000: 81 %2001: 78.4 %2002: 79 %2003: 80.8 %2004: 80.9 %2005: 81.1 %2006: 82.1 %2007: 81.9 %2008: 82.8 %2009: 81.7 %2010: 81.1 %2011: 83.4 %2012: 82.7 %2013: 85.8 %2014: 84.9 %2015: 85.2 %2016: 85 %2017: 86 %2018: 85.3 %2019: 85 %2020: 83.2 %2021: 83.8 %2022: 86 %2023: 84.8 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

The most recent figure for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in Australia and New Zealand is 84.85 %, measured in 2023.

The figure is down 1.4% on the previous year and down 1.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in Australia and New Zealand peaked at 86.04 % in 2017 and was at its lowest, 78.36 %, in 2001.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 21st of 125 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 24 years of available data.

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Australia and New Zealand, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value in Australia and New Zealand, 2000 to 2023.
Year % Change
2000 81.05 %
2001 78.36 % -3.3%
2002 78.95 % +0.8%
2003 80.78 % +2.3%
2004 80.86 % +0.1%
2005 81.12 % +0.3%
2006 82.13 % +1.2%
2007 81.88 % -0.3%
2008 82.8 % +1.1%
2009 81.73 % -1.3%
2010 81.1 % -0.8%
2011 83.44 % +2.9%
2012 82.71 % -0.9%
2013 85.82 % +3.8%
2014 84.92 % -1.0%
2015 85.17 % +0.3%
2016 85.04 % -0.2%
2017 86.04 % +1.2%
2018 85.3 % -0.9%
2019 85.03 % -0.3%
2020 83.16 % -2.2%
2021 83.81 % +0.8%
2022 86.03 % +2.6%
2023 84.85 % -1.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 80.97 % 78.36 % 82.8 % 10
2010s 84.46 % 81.1 % 86.04 % 10
2020s 84.46 % 83.16 % 86.03 % 4

Countries ranked near Australia and New Zealand

  1. 18 Côte d'Ivoire 48.22 % compare
  2. 18 Denmark 86.52 % compare
  3. 19 Honduras 86.33 % compare
  4. 20 Czechia 86 % compare
  5. 21 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 84.85 % compare
  6. 23 Japan 84.47 % compare
  7. 23 Caribbean 35.56 % compare
  8. 24 Italy 84.02 % compare

See the full ranking of 171 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Australia and New Zealand

All data for Australia and New Zealand →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in Australia and New Zealand?
Fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in Australia and New Zealand was 84.85 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs recorded in Australia and New Zealand?
The highest recorded value was 86.04 % in 2017.
What is the lowest fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs recorded in Australia and New Zealand?
The lowest recorded value was 78.36 % in 2001.
How does Australia and New Zealand rank for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 21st out of 125 countries with data for 2023.
Is fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs rising or falling in Australia and New Zealand?
Over the last ten years it is down 1.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Australia and New Zealand data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Australia and New Zealand. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/australia-and-new-zealand/">FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Australia and New Zealand</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.