FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Philippines

Philippines: FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment was 61.43 % in 2023. ▼ Falling

Latest (2023)
61.43 %
Change on year
down 2.1%
World rank
67th
of 137 countries
All-time high
73 %
in 2000
All-time low
61.43 %
in 2023
Years of data
24
2000–2023

FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Philippines, 2000–2023

0204060802000201120232000: 73 %2001: 72.8 %2002: 72.2 %2003: 71.8 %2004: 71.1 %2005: 70.9 %2006: 70.2 %2007: 69.7 %2008: 68.9 %2009: 68.3 %2010: 67.7 %2011: 66.9 %2012: 67.2 %2013: 66.2 %2014: 65.8 %2015: 65.3 %2016: 64.9 %2017: 63.1 %2018: 63.1 %2019: 61.6 %2020: 63.9 %2021: 64.2 %2022: 62.8 %2023: 61.4 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

In 2023, fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Philippines stood at 61.43 %. That is the lowest value across all 24 years on record.

That represents a change of down 2.1% on the previous year and down 7.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Philippines peaked at 73 % in 2000 and was at its lowest, 61.43 %, in 2023.

Philippines ranks 67th of 137 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 24 years of available data.

FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Philippines, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value in Philippines, 2000 to 2023.
Year % Change
2000 73 %
2001 72.78 % -0.3%
2002 72.22 % -0.8%
2003 71.85 % -0.5%
2004 71.12 % -1.0%
2005 70.87 % -0.4%
2006 70.25 % -0.9%
2007 69.65 % -0.9%
2008 68.9 % -1.1%
2009 68.31 % -0.9%
2010 67.69 % -0.9%
2011 66.89 % -1.2%
2012 67.18 % +0.4%
2013 66.19 % -1.5%
2014 65.83 % -0.5%
2015 65.28 % -0.8%
2016 64.91 % -0.6%
2017 63.14 % -2.7%
2018 63.1 % -0.1%
2019 61.59 % -2.4%
2020 63.94 % +3.8%
2021 64.23 % +0.5%
2022 62.77 % -2.3%
2023 61.43 % -2.1%

Philippines compared with similar countries

  • Philippines's 61.43 % is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 61.89 %, 99% of the median. (36 countries reporting)
  • Philippines's 61.43 % is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 75.88 %, 81% of the median. (18 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 70.9 % 68.31 % 73 % 10
2010s 65.18 % 61.59 % 67.69 % 10
2020s 63.09 % 61.43 % 64.23 % 4

Countries ranked near Philippines

  1. 64 Thailand 64.46 % compare
  2. 65 Ecuador 62.38 % compare
  3. 66 Albania 62.34 % compare
  4. 68 Sri Lanka 60.19 % compare
  5. 69 Indonesia 59.37 % compare
  6. 69 Jamaica 59.37 % compare
  7. 69 Peru 59.37 % compare

See the full ranking of 185 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Philippines

All data for Philippines →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Philippines?
Fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Philippines was 61.43 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment recorded in Philippines?
The highest recorded value was 73 % in 2000.
What is the lowest fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment recorded in Philippines?
The lowest recorded value was 61.43 % in 2023.
How does Philippines rank for fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment?
Philippines ranks 67th out of 137 countries with data for 2023.
Is fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment rising or falling in Philippines?
Over the last ten years it is down 7.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Philippines data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Philippines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-agricultural-employment-in-total-afs-employment-male-value/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-agricultural-employment-in-total-afs-employment-male-value/philippines/">FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Philippines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
185 places, 4,347 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.