FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Ecuador

Ecuador: FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment was 62.38 % in 2023. ▼ Falling

Latest (2023)
62.38 %
Change on year
down 1.0%
World rank
65th
of 137 countries
All-time high
70.29 %
in 2000
All-time low
62.38 %
in 2023
Years of data
24
2000–2023

FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Ecuador, 2000–2023

0204060802000201120232000: 70.3 %2001: 64 %2002: 65.4 %2003: 67 %2004: 65.1 %2005: 66.5 %2006: 64.8 %2007: 64.4 %2008: 65.3 %2009: 66.2 %2010: 65.3 %2011: 65.7 %2012: 65.5 %2013: 66.6 %2014: 62.7 %2015: 63.6 %2016: 62.6 %2017: 63.3 %2018: 64.1 %2019: 64.7 %2020: 64.7 %2021: 62.6 %2022: 63 %2023: 62.4 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

The most recent figure for fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Ecuador is 62.38 %, measured in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 24 years on record.

That represents a change of down 1.0% on the previous year and down 6.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Ecuador peaked at 70.29 % in 2000 and was at its lowest, 62.38 %, in 2023.

That places Ecuador 65th out of 137 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 24 years of available data.

FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Ecuador, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value in Ecuador, 2000 to 2023.
Year % Change
2000 70.29 %
2001 64.05 % -8.9%
2002 65.4 % +2.1%
2003 67.04 % +2.5%
2004 65.1 % -2.9%
2005 66.55 % +2.2%
2006 64.78 % -2.7%
2007 64.4 % -0.6%
2008 65.31 % +1.4%
2009 66.22 % +1.4%
2010 65.29 % -1.4%
2011 65.67 % +0.6%
2012 65.5 % -0.3%
2013 66.62 % +1.7%
2014 62.74 % -5.8%
2015 63.64 % +1.4%
2016 62.57 % -1.7%
2017 63.32 % +1.2%
2018 64.1 % +1.2%
2019 64.71 % +1.0%
2020 64.69 % -0.0%
2021 62.6 % -3.2%
2022 63.03 % +0.7%
2023 62.38 % -1.0%

Ecuador compared with similar countries

  • Ecuador's 62.38 % is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 61.89 %, 1.0× the median. (36 countries reporting)
  • Ecuador's 62.38 % is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 60.88 %, 1.0× the median. (22 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 65.91 % 64.05 % 70.29 % 10
2010s 64.42 % 62.57 % 66.62 % 10
2020s 63.17 % 62.38 % 64.69 % 4

Countries ranked near Ecuador

  1. 62 Namibia 65.51 % compare
  2. 63 Armenia 64.89 % compare
  3. 64 Thailand 64.46 % compare
  4. 66 Albania 62.34 % compare
  5. 67 Philippines 61.43 % compare
  6. 68 Sri Lanka 60.19 % compare

See the full ranking of 185 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Ecuador

All data for Ecuador →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Ecuador?
Fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Ecuador was 62.38 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment recorded in Ecuador?
The highest recorded value was 70.29 % in 2000.
What is the lowest fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment recorded in Ecuador?
The lowest recorded value was 62.38 % in 2023.
How does Ecuador rank for fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment?
Ecuador ranks 65th out of 137 countries with data for 2023.
Is fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment rising or falling in Ecuador?
Over the last ten years it is down 6.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Ecuador data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Ecuador. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-agricultural-employment-in-total-afs-employment-male-value/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-agricultural-employment-in-total-afs-employment-male-value/ecuador/">FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Ecuador</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
185 places, 4,347 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.