FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Australia and New Zealand

Australia and New Zealand: FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment was 15.15 % in 2023. ▼ Falling

Latest (2023)
15.15 %
Change on year
up 8.4%
World rank
115th
of 137 countries
All-time high
21.64 %
in 2001
All-time low
13.96 %
in 2017
Years of data
24
2000–2023

FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Australia and New Zealand, 2000–2023

051015202000201120232000: 18.9 %2001: 21.6 %2002: 21.1 %2003: 19.2 %2004: 19.1 %2005: 18.9 %2006: 17.9 %2007: 18.1 %2008: 17.2 %2009: 18.3 %2010: 18.9 %2011: 16.6 %2012: 17.3 %2013: 14.2 %2014: 15.1 %2015: 14.8 %2016: 15 %2017: 14 %2018: 14.7 %2019: 15 %2020: 16.8 %2021: 16.2 %2022: 14 %2023: 15.2 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

The most recent figure for fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Australia and New Zealand is 15.15 %, measured in 2023.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 8.4% on the previous year and up 6.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Australia and New Zealand peaked at 21.64 % in 2001 and was at its lowest, 13.96 %, in 2017.

That places Australia and New Zealand 115th out of 137 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 24 years of available data.

FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Australia and New Zealand, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value in Australia and New Zealand, 2000 to 2023.
Year % Change
2000 18.95 %
2001 21.64 % +14.2%
2002 21.05 % -2.7%
2003 19.22 % -8.7%
2004 19.14 % -0.4%
2005 18.88 % -1.4%
2006 17.87 % -5.3%
2007 18.12 % +1.4%
2008 17.2 % -5.1%
2009 18.27 % +6.2%
2010 18.9 % +3.4%
2011 16.56 % -12.4%
2012 17.29 % +4.4%
2013 14.18 % -18.0%
2014 15.08 % +6.3%
2015 14.83 % -1.7%
2016 14.96 % +0.9%
2017 13.96 % -6.7%
2018 14.7 % +5.3%
2019 14.97 % +1.8%
2020 16.84 % +12.5%
2021 16.19 % -3.9%
2022 13.97 % -13.7%
2023 15.15 % +8.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 19.03 % 17.2 % 21.64 % 10
2010s 15.54 % 13.96 % 18.9 % 10
2020s 15.54 % 13.97 % 16.84 % 4

Countries ranked near Australia and New Zealand

  1. 112 Jordan 16.09 % compare
  2. 113 Italy 15.98 % compare
  3. 114 Japan 15.53 % compare
  4. 115 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 15.15 % compare
  5. 117 Czechia 14 % compare
  6. 118 Honduras 13.67 % compare

See the full ranking of 185 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Australia and New Zealand

All data for Australia and New Zealand →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Australia and New Zealand?
Fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Australia and New Zealand was 15.15 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment recorded in Australia and New Zealand?
The highest recorded value was 21.64 % in 2001.
What is the lowest fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment recorded in Australia and New Zealand?
The lowest recorded value was 13.96 % in 2017.
How does Australia and New Zealand rank for fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 115th out of 137 countries with data for 2023.
Is fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment rising or falling in Australia and New Zealand?
Over the last ten years it is up 6.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Australia and New Zealand data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Australia and New Zealand. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-agricultural-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-agricultural-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/australia-and-new-zealand/">FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Australia and New Zealand</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
185 places, 4,347 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.