Eggs Primary — Production, per square kilometre in Ecuador
Ecuador: Eggs Primary — Production, per square kilometre was 0.6808 t per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Eggs Primary — Production, per square kilometre in Ecuador, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for eggs primary — production, per square kilometre in Ecuador is 0.6808 t per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 2.6% on the previous year and down 4.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, eggs primary — production, per square kilometre in Ecuador peaked at 0.7127 t per square kilometre in 2013 and was at its lowest, 0.029 t per square kilometre, in 1961.
Ecuador ranks 72nd of 167 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Eggs Primary — Production, per square kilometre in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.029 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0299 t per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1963 | 0.0324 t per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1964 | 0.0344 t per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1965 | 0.0364 t per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1966 | 0.0365 t per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1967 | 0.0367 t per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1968 | 0.0367 t per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1969 | 0.0368 t per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1970 | 0.0412 t per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 1971 | 0.0477 t per square kilometre | +15.8% |
| 1972 | 0.0704 t per square kilometre | +47.6% |
| 1973 | 0.0744 t per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1974 | 0.0795 t per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 1975 | 0.068 t per square kilometre | -14.5% |
| 1976 | 0.0758 t per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 1977 | 0.102 t per square kilometre | +34.5% |
| 1978 | 0.1181 t per square kilometre | +15.8% |
| 1979 | 0.1414 t per square kilometre | +19.7% |
| 1980 | 0.162 t per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 1981 | 0.1632 t per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1982 | 0.1786 t per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 1983 | 0.1327 t per square kilometre | -25.7% |
| 1984 | 0.1429 t per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1985 | 0.1556 t per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 1986 | 0.1863 t per square kilometre | +19.8% |
| 1987 | 0.1637 t per square kilometre | -12.1% |
| 1988 | 0.1596 t per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 1989 | 0.1532 t per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 1990 | 0.2019 t per square kilometre | +31.7% |
| 1991 | 0.2027 t per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1992 | 0.1918 t per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 1993 | 0.1884 t per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 1994 | 0.1946 t per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1995 | 0.2167 t per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 1996 | 0.1951 t per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 1997 | 0.2094 t per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 1998 | 0.2427 t per square kilometre | +15.9% |
| 1999 | 0.2234 t per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 2000 | 0.2905 t per square kilometre | +30.1% |
| 2001 | 0.2919 t per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2002 | 0.296 t per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2003 | 0.2978 t per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2004 | 0.2982 t per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2005 | 0.302 t per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2006 | 0.3422 t per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 2007 | 0.3543 t per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2008 | 0.3664 t per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2009 | 0.3769 t per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2010 | 0.4429 t per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 2011 | 0.5234 t per square kilometre | +18.2% |
| 2012 | 0.6281 t per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 2013 | 0.7127 t per square kilometre | +13.5% |
| 2014 | 0.6845 t per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 2015 | 0.6636 t per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 2016 | 0.6869 t per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2017 | 0.6783 t per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2018 | 0.6763 t per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2019 | 0.6764 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.6764 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.6764 t per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.6988 t per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2023 | 0.6808 t per square kilometre | -2.6% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 0.6808 t per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.682 t per square kilometre, 100% of the median. (50 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 0.6808 t per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.7584 t per square kilometre, 90% of the median. (32 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0343 t per square kilometre | 0.029 t per square kilometre | 0.0368 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0818 t per square kilometre | 0.0412 t per square kilometre | 0.1414 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.1598 t per square kilometre | 0.1327 t per square kilometre | 0.1863 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.2067 t per square kilometre | 0.1884 t per square kilometre | 0.2427 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.3216 t per square kilometre | 0.2905 t per square kilometre | 0.3769 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.6373 t per square kilometre | 0.4429 t per square kilometre | 0.7127 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.6831 t per square kilometre | 0.6764 t per square kilometre | 0.6988 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More agriculture & rural data for Ecuador
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.59 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.097 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 691.36 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.4287 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3661 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 9.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 9.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is eggs primary — production, per square kilometre in Ecuador?
- Eggs primary — production, per square kilometre in Ecuador was 0.6808 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest eggs primary — production, per square kilometre recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 0.7127 t per square kilometre in 2013.
- What is the lowest eggs primary — production, per square kilometre recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.029 t per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Ecuador rank for eggs primary — production, per square kilometre?
- Ecuador ranks 72nd out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is eggs primary — production, per square kilometre rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 4.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Eggs Primary — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Eggs Primary — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Eggs Primary — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Eggs Primary — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Eggs Primary — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.