Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Singapore
Singapore: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. was 106.4 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Singapore, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Analysis
The most recent figure for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Singapore is 106.4, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of up 0.8% on the previous year and up 9.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Singapore peaked at 366.21 in 1982 and was at its lowest, 55.28, in 1987.
Singapore ranks 20th of 63 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Singapore, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 207.29 | — |
| 1962 | 207.29 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 207.29 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 207.29 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 207.29 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 241.83 | +16.7% |
| 1967 | 241.83 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 276.38 | +14.3% |
| 1969 | 310.93 | +12.5% |
| 1970 | 276.38 | -11.1% |
| 1971 | 276.38 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 310.93 | +12.5% |
| 1973 | 310.93 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 345.48 | +11.1% |
| 1975 | 345.48 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 276.38 | -20.0% |
| 1977 | 310.93 | +12.5% |
| 1978 | 310.93 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 345.48 | +11.1% |
| 1980 | 345.48 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 310.93 | -10.0% |
| 1982 | 366.21 | +17.8% |
| 1983 | 276.38 | -24.5% |
| 1984 | 276.38 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 221.11 | -20.0% |
| 1986 | 110.55 | -50.0% |
| 1987 | 55.28 | -50.0% |
| 1988 | 82.91 | +50.0% |
| 1989 | 82.91 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 69.1 | -16.7% |
| 1991 | 73.21 | +5.9% |
| 1992 | 78.53 | +7.3% |
| 1993 | 76.61 | -2.4% |
| 1994 | 73.69 | -3.8% |
| 1995 | 69.52 | -5.7% |
| 1996 | 69.1 | -0.6% |
| 1997 | 69.1 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 69.08 | -0.0% |
| 1999 | 69.11 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 69.1 | -0.0% |
| 2001 | 69.1 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 69.1 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 70.49 | +2.0% |
| 2004 | 72.44 | +2.8% |
| 2005 | 74.04 | +2.2% |
| 2006 | 75.64 | +2.2% |
| 2007 | 82.71 | +9.3% |
| 2008 | 85.52 | +3.4% |
| 2009 | 88.42 | +3.4% |
| 2010 | 91.16 | +3.1% |
| 2011 | 93.72 | +2.8% |
| 2012 | 96.73 | +3.2% |
| 2013 | 96.73 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 97.49 | +0.8% |
| 2015 | 103.33 | +6.0% |
| 2016 | 99.18 | -4.0% |
| 2017 | 100.49 | +1.3% |
| 2018 | 101.37 | +0.9% |
| 2019 | 102.09 | +0.7% |
| 2020 | 102.6 | +0.5% |
| 2021 | 104.01 | +1.4% |
| 2022 | 104.8 | +0.8% |
| 2023 | 105.6 | +0.8% |
| 2024 | 106.4 | +0.8% |
Singapore compared with similar countries
- Singapore's 106.4 is above the median for high income countries, which is 104.17, 1.0× the median. (11 countries reporting)
- Singapore's 106.4 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 103.56, 1.0× the median. (15 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Singapore changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1986 | -50.0% | 221.11 | 110.55 |
| 1987 | -50.0% | 110.55 | 55.28 |
| 1988 | +50.0% | 55.28 | 82.91 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 234.16 | 207.29 | 310.93 | 9 |
| 1970s | 310.93 | 276.38 | 345.48 | 10 |
| 1980s | 212.81 | 55.28 | 366.21 | 10 |
| 1990s | 71.7 | 69.08 | 78.53 | 10 |
| 2000s | 75.66 | 69.1 | 88.42 | 10 |
| 2010s | 98.23 | 91.16 | 103.33 | 10 |
| 2020s | 104.68 | 102.6 | 106.4 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Singapore
More agriculture & rural data for Singapore
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -1.4 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 24.33 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 0.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 0.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.4% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.2% (2024)
- Rural population 0.0% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Singapore?
- Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Singapore was 106.4 in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Singapore?
- The highest recorded value was 366.21 in 1982.
- What is the lowest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Singapore?
- The lowest recorded value was 55.28 in 1987.
- How does Singapore rank for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
- Singapore ranks 20th out of 63 countries with data for 2024.
- Is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. rising or falling in Singapore?
- Over the last ten years it is up 9.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Singapore data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.