Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Uruguay
Uruguay: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per was 0.0292 t per square kilometre in 2023. ▼ Falling
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Uruguay, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Uruguay stood at 0.0292 t per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 7.3% on the previous year and down 18.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Uruguay peaked at 0.1142 t per square kilometre in 1970 and was at its lowest, 0.0188 t per square kilometre, in 2016.
Uruguay ranks 38th of 160 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 63 years of available data.
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Uruguay, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0733 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0753 t per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1963 | 0.0681 t per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 1964 | 0.0694 t per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1965 | 0.0759 t per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 1966 | 0.0864 t per square kilometre | +13.8% |
| 1967 | 0.0683 t per square kilometre | -21.0% |
| 1968 | 0.0873 t per square kilometre | +27.9% |
| 1969 | 0.0773 t per square kilometre | -11.5% |
| 1970 | 0.1142 t per square kilometre | +47.8% |
| 1971 | 0.0912 t per square kilometre | -20.2% |
| 1972 | 0.0872 t per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 1973 | 0.0629 t per square kilometre | -27.9% |
| 1974 | 0.0678 t per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 1975 | 0.0556 t per square kilometre | -18.1% |
| 1976 | 0.0501 t per square kilometre | -9.7% |
| 1977 | 0.0511 t per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1978 | 0.0498 t per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 1979 | 0.039 t per square kilometre | -21.7% |
| 1980 | 0.0432 t per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 1981 | 0.0642 t per square kilometre | +48.5% |
| 1982 | 0.0629 t per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 1983 | 0.0563 t per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 1984 | 0.0558 t per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1985 | 0.0586 t per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1986 | 0.0676 t per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 1987 | 0.0689 t per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1988 | 0.0735 t per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1989 | 0.0755 t per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1990 | 0.0801 t per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1991 | 0.0819 t per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1992 | 0.0843 t per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1993 | 0.0838 t per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 1994 | 0.0864 t per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1995 | 0.0681 t per square kilometre | -21.2% |
| 1996 | 0.0838 t per square kilometre | +23.1% |
| 1997 | 0.0786 t per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 1998 | 0.072 t per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 1999 | 0.0668 t per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 2000 | 0.0668 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.067 t per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2002 | 0.0404 t per square kilometre | -39.8% |
| 2003 | 0.0353 t per square kilometre | -12.7% |
| 2004 | 0.0347 t per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2005 | 0.0432 t per square kilometre | +24.5% |
| 2006 | 0.0406 t per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 2007 | 0.0357 t per square kilometre | -12.0% |
| 2008 | 0.0393 t per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 2009 | 0.0428 t per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 2010 | 0.0269 t per square kilometre | -37.2% |
| 2011 | 0.0266 t per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 2012 | 0.0253 t per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 2013 | 0.036 t per square kilometre | +42.3% |
| 2014 | 0.0314 t per square kilometre | -12.6% |
| 2015 | 0.019 t per square kilometre | -39.5% |
| 2016 | 0.0188 t per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2017 | 0.0189 t per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2018 | 0.023 t per square kilometre | +21.9% |
| 2019 | 0.0231 t per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2020 | 0.031 t per square kilometre | +33.9% |
| 2021 | 0.0323 t per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2022 | 0.0315 t per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 2023 | 0.0292 t per square kilometre | -7.3% |
Uruguay compared with similar countries
- Uruguay's 0.0292 t per square kilometre is above the median for high income countries, which is 0.0094 t per square kilometre, 3.1× the median. (54 countries reporting)
- Uruguay's 0.0292 t per square kilometre is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.0025 t per square kilometre, 11.9× the median. (31 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0757 t per square kilometre | 0.0681 t per square kilometre | 0.0873 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0669 t per square kilometre | 0.039 t per square kilometre | 0.1142 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0626 t per square kilometre | 0.0432 t per square kilometre | 0.0755 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0786 t per square kilometre | 0.0668 t per square kilometre | 0.0864 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0446 t per square kilometre | 0.0347 t per square kilometre | 0.067 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0249 t per square kilometre | 0.0188 t per square kilometre | 0.036 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.031 t per square kilometre | 0.0292 t per square kilometre | 0.0323 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Uruguay
- 35 Nigeria 0.0323 t per square kilometre compare
- 36 Sudan 0.0314 t per square kilometre compare
- 37 Afghanistan 0.0307 t per square kilometre compare
- 39 Mongolia 0.0283 t per square kilometre compare
- 40 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0.028 t per square kilometre compare
- 41 Cuba 0.0276 t per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Uruguay
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 3.67 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0638 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,609 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.32 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.0435 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.4% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.4% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 14.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Uruguay?
- Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Uruguay was 0.0292 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Uruguay?
- The highest recorded value was 0.1142 t per square kilometre in 1970.
- What is the lowest edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Uruguay?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0188 t per square kilometre in 2016.
- How does Uruguay rank for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Uruguay ranks 38th out of 160 countries with data for 2023.
- Is edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per rising or falling in Uruguay?
- Over the last ten years it is down 18.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Uruguay data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.