Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Cuba
Cuba: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per was 0.0055 t per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Cuba, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
Cuba recorded 0.0055 t per square kilometre for edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of down 90.7% on the previous year and down 91.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Cuba peaked at 0.0758 t per square kilometre in 2018 and was at its lowest, 0.0055 t per square kilometre, in 2023.
Cuba ranks 105th of 150 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Cuba, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0084 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0087 t per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1963 | 0.0092 t per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1964 | 0.0097 t per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1965 | 0.0102 t per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1966 | 0.0109 t per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1967 | 0.0102 t per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 1968 | 0.0096 t per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 1969 | 0.0099 t per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1970 | 0.0102 t per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1971 | 0.0119 t per square kilometre | +17.1% |
| 1972 | 0.0117 t per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1973 | 0.0127 t per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 1974 | 0.0118 t per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 1975 | 0.0108 t per square kilometre | -8.8% |
| 1976 | 0.013 t per square kilometre | +21.0% |
| 1977 | 0.0243 t per square kilometre | +86.8% |
| 1978 | 0.0153 t per square kilometre | -37.1% |
| 1979 | 0.015 t per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 1980 | 0.0143 t per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 1981 | 0.0168 t per square kilometre | +17.8% |
| 1982 | 0.0175 t per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1983 | 0.0188 t per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1984 | 0.0213 t per square kilometre | +13.1% |
| 1985 | 0.0235 t per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 1986 | 0.0249 t per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1987 | 0.0263 t per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1988 | 0.026 t per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 1989 | 0.0274 t per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1990 | 0.0314 t per square kilometre | +14.5% |
| 1991 | 0.0283 t per square kilometre | -9.8% |
| 1992 | 0.025 t per square kilometre | -11.5% |
| 1993 | 0.0335 t per square kilometre | +33.9% |
| 1994 | 0.0362 t per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 1995 | 0.0334 t per square kilometre | -7.9% |
| 1996 | 0.0361 t per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 1997 | 0.0201 t per square kilometre | -44.4% |
| 1998 | 0.0251 t per square kilometre | +24.9% |
| 1999 | 0.0308 t per square kilometre | +23.1% |
| 2000 | 0.0293 t per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 2001 | 0.0235 t per square kilometre | -19.6% |
| 2002 | 0.0281 t per square kilometre | +19.5% |
| 2003 | 0.0294 t per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 2004 | 0.0308 t per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 2005 | 0.0303 t per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2006 | 0.0313 t per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2007 | 0.0554 t per square kilometre | +77.2% |
| 2008 | 0.0604 t per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 2009 | 0.056 t per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 2010 | 0.0539 t per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 2011 | 0.055 t per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2012 | 0.052 t per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 2013 | 0.0618 t per square kilometre | +18.9% |
| 2014 | 0.0631 t per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2015 | 0.0655 t per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2016 | 0.0717 t per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 2017 | 0.0752 t per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2018 | 0.0758 t per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2019 | 0.0758 t per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.0427 t per square kilometre | -43.7% |
| 2021 | 0.0427 t per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2022 | 0.0589 t per square kilometre | +37.9% |
| 2023 | 0.0055 t per square kilometre | -90.7% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's 0.0055 t per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.0186 t per square kilometre, 29% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Cuba's 0.0055 t per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.0223 t per square kilometre, 24% of the median. (32 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Cuba changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | -90.7% | 0.0589 t per square kilometre | 0.0055 t per square kilometre |
| 1977 | +86.8% | 0.013 t per square kilometre | 0.0243 t per square kilometre |
| 2007 | +77.2% | 0.0313 t per square kilometre | 0.0554 t per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0096 t per square kilometre | 0.0084 t per square kilometre | 0.0109 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0137 t per square kilometre | 0.0102 t per square kilometre | 0.0243 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0217 t per square kilometre | 0.0143 t per square kilometre | 0.0274 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.03 t per square kilometre | 0.0201 t per square kilometre | 0.0362 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0375 t per square kilometre | 0.0235 t per square kilometre | 0.0604 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.065 t per square kilometre | 0.052 t per square kilometre | 0.0758 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0374 t per square kilometre | 0.0055 t per square kilometre | 0.0589 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
- 102 Eswatini 0.0058 t per square kilometre compare
- 103 Belize 0.0056 t per square kilometre compare
- 104 Nicaragua 0.0056 t per square kilometre compare
- 106 Mozambique 0.0054 t per square kilometre compare
- 107 Lebanon 0.0053 t per square kilometre compare
- 108 Fiji 0.0053 t per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Cuba
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -19.64 % change on previous year (2020)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0276 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2020)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 265.29 current US$ per person (2020)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.6522 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2020)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2277 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 1.2% (2024)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 1.2% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.5% (2022)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.4% (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Cuba?
- Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Cuba was 0.0055 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0758 t per square kilometre in 2018.
- What is the lowest edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0055 t per square kilometre in 2023.
- How does Cuba rank for edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Cuba ranks 105th out of 150 countries with data for 2023.
- Is edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is down 91.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.