Cuba vs Eswatini: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Cuba
0.0055 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
0.0058 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
105th
Eswatini rank
102nd
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Cuba
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.0058 t per square kilometre against 0.0055 t per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0.0003 t per square kilometre.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 105th and Eswatini ranks 102nd of 150 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0096 t per square kilometre | 0.0012 t per square kilometre | 0.0085 t per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 1970s | 0.0137 t per square kilometre | 0.0019 t per square kilometre | 0.0118 t per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 1980s | 0.0217 t per square kilometre | 0.0022 t per square kilometre | 0.0195 t per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 1990s | 0.03 t per square kilometre | 0.0033 t per square kilometre | 0.0266 t per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 2000s | 0.0375 t per square kilometre | 0.0039 t per square kilometre | 0.0335 t per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0.065 t per square kilometre | 0.0043 t per square kilometre | 0.0606 t per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0.0374 t per square kilometre | 0.0063 t per square kilometre | 0.0312 t per square kilometre | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Cuba or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 0.0058 t per square kilometre against 0.0055 t per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Cuba and Eswatini?
- 0.0003 t per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Eswatini?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Eswatini rank globally for edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Cuba ranks 105th and Eswatini ranks 102nd of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.