Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit in Singapore
Singapore: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit in Singapore, 1961–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2024, edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per unit in Singapore stood at 0 t per US$ of GDP. That is the lowest value across all 64 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 10.8% on the previous year and down 62.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per unit in Singapore peaked at 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1964 and was at its lowest, 0 t per US$ of GDP, in 2024.
Singapore ranks 145th of 145 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit in Singapore, year by year
| Year | t per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -20.7% |
| 1963 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +17.6% |
| 1964 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +32.6% |
| 1965 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -36.5% |
| 1966 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -37.1% |
| 1967 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +10.9% |
| 1968 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -10.3% |
| 1969 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +46.7% |
| 1970 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -38.2% |
| 1971 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -3.9% |
| 1972 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -34.4% |
| 1973 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -26.4% |
| 1974 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -43.6% |
| 1975 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -59.1% |
| 1976 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +19.1% |
| 1977 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -22.5% |
| 1978 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -45.1% |
| 1979 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +11.2% |
| 1980 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -50.3% |
| 1981 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -76.0% |
| 1982 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -11.9% |
| 1983 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +35.7% |
| 1984 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -40.0% |
| 1985 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -48.5% |
| 1986 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +724.5% |
| 1987 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +75.8% |
| 1988 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -84.4% |
| 1989 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -16.7% |
| 1990 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +344.9% |
| 1991 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -74.9% |
| 1992 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +246.0% |
| 1993 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -5.3% |
| 1994 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -73.6% |
| 1995 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -40.1% |
| 1996 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -27.0% |
| 1997 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +20.2% |
| 1998 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -6.6% |
| 1999 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +49.0% |
| 2000 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +4.8% |
| 2001 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +22.3% |
| 2002 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +55.7% |
| 2003 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -40.9% |
| 2004 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +16.7% |
| 2005 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -3.2% |
| 2006 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -35.8% |
| 2007 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +2.3% |
| 2008 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -6.5% |
| 2009 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -0.3% |
| 2010 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -19.0% |
| 2011 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -14.2% |
| 2012 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +1.8% |
| 2013 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -4.1% |
| 2014 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -2.3% |
| 2015 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -9.3% |
| 2016 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -11.6% |
| 2017 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -13.4% |
| 2018 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -17.2% |
| 2019 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -5.8% |
| 2020 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +0.3% |
| 2021 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -11.1% |
| 2022 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -14.2% |
| 2023 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +2.7% |
| 2024 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -10.8% |
Singapore compared with similar countries
- Singapore's 0 t per US$ of GDP is below the median for high income countries, which is 0 t per US$ of GDP, 0% of the median. (45 countries reporting)
- Singapore's 0 t per US$ of GDP is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0 t per US$ of GDP, 0% of the median. (17 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit in Singapore changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1986 | +724.5% | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP |
| 1990 | +344.9% | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP |
| 1992 | +246.0% | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Singapore
More agriculture & rural data for Singapore
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -1.4 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 24.33 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 0.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 0.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.4% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.2% (2024)
- Rural population 0.0% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per unit in Singapore?
- Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per unit in Singapore was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per unit recorded in Singapore?
- The highest recorded value was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1964.
- What is the lowest edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per unit recorded in Singapore?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2024.
- How does Singapore rank for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per unit?
- Singapore ranks 145th out of 145 countries with data for 2024.
- Is edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per unit rising or falling in Singapore?
- Over the last ten years it is down 62.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Singapore data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.