Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Zambia
Zambia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per was 0.0506 t per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Zambia, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Zambia is 0.0506 t per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 28.7% on the previous year and up 17.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Zambia peaked at 0.0506 t per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.0054 t per square kilometre, in 1964.
Zambia ranks 92nd of 167 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Zambia, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0055 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0054 t per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1963 | 0.0054 t per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1964 | 0.0054 t per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 1965 | 0.0059 t per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 1966 | 0.006 t per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1967 | 0.0057 t per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 1968 | 0.006 t per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1969 | 0.0055 t per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 1970 | 0.006 t per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 1971 | 0.0057 t per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 1972 | 0.0056 t per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 1973 | 0.0058 t per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1974 | 0.0054 t per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 1975 | 0.0056 t per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1976 | 0.006 t per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 1977 | 0.006 t per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1978 | 0.006 t per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 1979 | 0.006 t per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1980 | 0.0061 t per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1981 | 0.0067 t per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1982 | 0.0071 t per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1983 | 0.0065 t per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 1984 | 0.0062 t per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 1985 | 0.0069 t per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 1986 | 0.007 t per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1987 | 0.0073 t per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1988 | 0.0074 t per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1989 | 0.0075 t per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1990 | 0.012 t per square kilometre | +61.2% |
| 1991 | 0.0126 t per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1992 | 0.0118 t per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 1993 | 0.0113 t per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 1994 | 0.011 t per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 1995 | 0.0095 t per square kilometre | -13.7% |
| 1996 | 0.0091 t per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 1997 | 0.011 t per square kilometre | +20.3% |
| 1998 | 0.0114 t per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1999 | 0.0125 t per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 2000 | 0.0115 t per square kilometre | -7.9% |
| 2001 | 0.0119 t per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2002 | 0.0129 t per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 2003 | 0.0129 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.0122 t per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 2005 | 0.0129 t per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 2006 | 0.0126 t per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 2007 | 0.0127 t per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2008 | 0.0171 t per square kilometre | +34.2% |
| 2009 | 0.0265 t per square kilometre | +55.1% |
| 2010 | 0.0335 t per square kilometre | +26.3% |
| 2011 | 0.0336 t per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2012 | 0.0351 t per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2013 | 0.0431 t per square kilometre | +23.0% |
| 2014 | 0.0453 t per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2015 | 0.0351 t per square kilometre | -22.6% |
| 2016 | 0.0347 t per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 2017 | 0.0456 t per square kilometre | +31.3% |
| 2018 | 0.0397 t per square kilometre | -13.1% |
| 2019 | 0.0406 t per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2020 | 0.0387 t per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 2021 | 0.0409 t per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 2022 | 0.0393 t per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 2023 | 0.0506 t per square kilometre | +28.7% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Zambia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | +61.2% | 0.0075 t per square kilometre | 0.012 t per square kilometre |
| 2009 | +55.1% | 0.0171 t per square kilometre | 0.0265 t per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0056 t per square kilometre | 0.0054 t per square kilometre | 0.006 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0058 t per square kilometre | 0.0054 t per square kilometre | 0.006 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0069 t per square kilometre | 0.0061 t per square kilometre | 0.0075 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0112 t per square kilometre | 0.0091 t per square kilometre | 0.0126 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0143 t per square kilometre | 0.0115 t per square kilometre | 0.0265 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0386 t per square kilometre | 0.0335 t per square kilometre | 0.0456 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0424 t per square kilometre | 0.0387 t per square kilometre | 0.0506 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zambia
- 89 Nigeria 0.053 t per square kilometre compare
- 90 Guinea-Bissau 0.0517 t per square kilometre compare
- 91 Djibouti 0.0509 t per square kilometre compare
- 93 Gambia 0.0481 t per square kilometre compare
- 94 Barbados 0.0471 t per square kilometre compare
- 95 Indonesia 0.0468 t per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Zambia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 65.37 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0411 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 54.11 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 1.97 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.5408 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 4.1% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 4.1% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.4% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Zambia?
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Zambia was 0.0506 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Zambia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0506 t per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Zambia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0054 t per square kilometre in 1964.
- How does Zambia rank for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Zambia ranks 92nd out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per rising or falling in Zambia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 17.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zambia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.