Guinea-Bissau vs Zambia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Guinea-Bissau
0.0517 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0506 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
90th
Zambia rank
92nd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Zambia
0.010.020.030.040.05196119922023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.0517 t per square kilometre against 0.0506 t per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.0011 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 90th and Zambia ranks 92nd of 167 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0123 t per square kilometre 0.0056 t per square kilometre 0.0067 t per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1970s 0.0135 t per square kilometre 0.0058 t per square kilometre 0.0077 t per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1980s 0.017 t per square kilometre 0.0069 t per square kilometre 0.0102 t per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1990s 0.0259 t per square kilometre 0.0112 t per square kilometre 0.0146 t per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0.0348 t per square kilometre 0.0143 t per square kilometre 0.0204 t per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2010s 0.0446 t per square kilometre 0.0386 t per square kilometre 0.006 t per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2020s 0.0515 t per square kilometre 0.0424 t per square kilometre 0.0091 t per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Guinea-Bissau or Zambia?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0.0517 t per square kilometre against 0.0506 t per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Guinea-Bissau and Zambia?
0.0011 t per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Zambia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 90th and Zambia ranks 92nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Zambia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/zambia/">Guinea-Bissau vs Zambia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.