Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Jamaica
Jamaica: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per was 0.12 t per square kilometre in 2023. ▼ Falling
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Jamaica, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Jamaica stood at 0.12 t per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.4% on the previous year and up 16.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Jamaica peaked at 0.3363 t per square kilometre in 1992 and was at its lowest, 0.0865 t per square kilometre, in 2011.
That places Jamaica 51st out of 167 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 63 years of available data.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Jamaica, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.2216 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.2001 t per square kilometre | -9.7% |
| 1963 | 0.2055 t per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1964 | 0.2152 t per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1965 | 0.1906 t per square kilometre | -11.5% |
| 1966 | 0.2089 t per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 1967 | 0.1575 t per square kilometre | -24.6% |
| 1968 | 0.1534 t per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 1969 | 0.2032 t per square kilometre | +32.5% |
| 1970 | 0.1781 t per square kilometre | -12.4% |
| 1971 | 0.1748 t per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 1972 | 0.1893 t per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1973 | 0.2122 t per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 1974 | 0.2356 t per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 1975 | 0.2308 t per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 1976 | 0.235 t per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1977 | 0.2281 t per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 1978 | 0.2142 t per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 1979 | 0.2109 t per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 1980 | 0.2222 t per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1981 | 0.2181 t per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 1982 | 0.2256 t per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1983 | 0.2163 t per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 1984 | 0.2235 t per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1985 | 0.2084 t per square kilometre | -6.8% |
| 1986 | 0.2246 t per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1987 | 0.2566 t per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 1988 | 0.2094 t per square kilometre | -18.4% |
| 1989 | 0.2066 t per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 1990 | 0.2312 t per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 1991 | 0.2965 t per square kilometre | +28.2% |
| 1992 | 0.3363 t per square kilometre | +13.4% |
| 1993 | 0.2888 t per square kilometre | -14.1% |
| 1994 | 0.2917 t per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1995 | 0.3081 t per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1996 | 0.2889 t per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 1997 | 0.2685 t per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 1998 | 0.2632 t per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 1999 | 0.2712 t per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2000 | 0.2593 t per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 2001 | 0.2418 t per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 2002 | 0.2633 t per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 2003 | 0.2533 t per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 2004 | 0.1985 t per square kilometre | -21.6% |
| 2005 | 0.1919 t per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 2006 | 0.1114 t per square kilometre | -41.9% |
| 2007 | 0.1023 t per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 2008 | 0.1107 t per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 2009 | 0.1002 t per square kilometre | -9.5% |
| 2010 | 0.0972 t per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 2011 | 0.0865 t per square kilometre | -11.0% |
| 2012 | 0.091 t per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2013 | 0.1034 t per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 2014 | 0.0954 t per square kilometre | -7.8% |
| 2015 | 0.1163 t per square kilometre | +22.0% |
| 2016 | 0.1187 t per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2017 | 0.103 t per square kilometre | -13.2% |
| 2018 | 0.1048 t per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2019 | 0.1095 t per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2020 | 0.1096 t per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2021 | 0.1209 t per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 2022 | 0.1184 t per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2023 | 0.12 t per square kilometre | +1.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1951 t per square kilometre | 0.1534 t per square kilometre | 0.2216 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.2109 t per square kilometre | 0.1748 t per square kilometre | 0.2356 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.2211 t per square kilometre | 0.2066 t per square kilometre | 0.2566 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.2844 t per square kilometre | 0.2312 t per square kilometre | 0.3363 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.1833 t per square kilometre | 0.1002 t per square kilometre | 0.2633 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.1026 t per square kilometre | 0.0865 t per square kilometre | 0.1187 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.1172 t per square kilometre | 0.1096 t per square kilometre | 0.1209 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Jamaica
More agriculture & rural data for Jamaica
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 13.16 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0874 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 699.7 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.28 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.4057 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 8.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 8.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.1% (2023)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.9% (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Jamaica?
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Jamaica was 0.12 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Jamaica?
- The highest recorded value was 0.3363 t per square kilometre in 1992.
- What is the lowest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Jamaica?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0865 t per square kilometre in 2011.
- How does Jamaica rank for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Jamaica ranks 51st out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per rising or falling in Jamaica?
- Over the last ten years it is up 16.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Jamaica data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.