Jamaica vs Romania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Jamaica
0.12 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
0.128 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Jamaica rank
51st
Romania rank
49th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Jamaica
  • Romania
0.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 0.128 t per square kilometre against 0.12 t per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 0.008 t per square kilometre.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.

Jamaica ranks 51st and Romania ranks 49th of 167 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1951 t per square kilometre 0.2122 t per square kilometre 0.0171 t per square kilometre Romania
1970s 0.2109 t per square kilometre 0.2931 t per square kilometre 0.0822 t per square kilometre Romania
1980s 0.2211 t per square kilometre 0.2641 t per square kilometre 0.043 t per square kilometre Romania
1990s 0.2844 t per square kilometre 0.2613 t per square kilometre 0.0231 t per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 0.1833 t per square kilometre 0.1879 t per square kilometre 0.0047 t per square kilometre Romania
2010s 0.1015 t per square kilometre 0.1385 t per square kilometre 0.0371 t per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Jamaica or Romania?
Romania, at 0.128 t per square kilometre against 0.12 t per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Jamaica and Romania?
0.008 t per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Romania?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Jamaica and Romania rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Jamaica ranks 51st and Romania ranks 49th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Romania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/romania/">Jamaica vs Romania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.