Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Bahamas
Bahamas: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per was 0.0003 t per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Bahamas, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
Bahamas recorded 0.0003 t per square kilometre for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in 2023.
The figure is down 1.2% on the previous year and down 8.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Bahamas peaked at 0.0028 t per square kilometre in 1966 and was at its lowest, 0.0003 t per square kilometre, in 2007.
That places Bahamas 166th out of 167 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Bahamas, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0023 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0023 t per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 1963 | 0.0023 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.0027 t per square kilometre | +18.6% |
| 1965 | 0.0027 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.0028 t per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1967 | 0.0027 t per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 1968 | 0.0021 t per square kilometre | -23.5% |
| 1969 | 0.0019 t per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 1970 | 0.0018 t per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 1971 | 0.0018 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.0014 t per square kilometre | -18.2% |
| 1973 | 0.0013 t per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 1974 | 0.0011 t per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 1975 | 0.0011 t per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 1976 | 0.001 t per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 1977 | 0.0009 t per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 1978 | 0.0008 t per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 1979 | 0.0008 t per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 1980 | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 1981 | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | -9.0% |
| 1982 | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1984 | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.0008 t per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 1986 | 0.0008 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 1988 | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 1989 | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.0009 t per square kilometre | +42.2% |
| 1992 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | -48.2% |
| 1993 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1994 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | -30.6% |
| 1995 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1996 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 1997 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2000 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 2001 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +17.6% |
| 2002 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +24.8% |
| 2003 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 2004 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2005 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | -36.5% |
| 2007 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 2008 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +13.4% |
| 2009 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 2010 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 2011 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2012 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2013 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 2015 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 2016 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 2017 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2018 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 2020 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 2021 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2022 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2023 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | -1.2% |
Bahamas compared with similar countries
- Bahamas's 0.0003 t per square kilometre is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.0504 t per square kilometre, 1% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Bahamas's 0.0003 t per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.0994 t per square kilometre, 0% of the median. (32 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Bahamas changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1992 | -48.2% | 0.0009 t per square kilometre | 0.0005 t per square kilometre |
| 1991 | +42.2% | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | 0.0009 t per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0024 t per square kilometre | 0.0019 t per square kilometre | 0.0028 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0012 t per square kilometre | 0.0008 t per square kilometre | 0.0018 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | 0.0008 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | 0.0009 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Bahamas
- 163 Papua New Guinea 0.0009 t per square kilometre compare
- 164 Gabon 0.0007 t per square kilometre compare
- 165 Libya 0.0004 t per square kilometre compare
- 167 Equatorial Guinea 0.0003 t per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Bahamas
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 17.44 % change on previous year (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0051 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 203.1 current US$ per person (2024)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.4043 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1867 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 0.5% (2024)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 0.5% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.6% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.9% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Bahamas?
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Bahamas was 0.0003 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Bahamas?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0028 t per square kilometre in 1966.
- What is the lowest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Bahamas?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0003 t per square kilometre in 2007.
- How does Bahamas rank for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Bahamas ranks 166th out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per rising or falling in Bahamas?
- Over the last ten years it is down 8.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Bahamas data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.