Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual in Réunion
Réunion: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual was 3.47 % change on previous year in 2006. ◆ Volatile
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual in Réunion, 1962–2006
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual in Réunion is 3.47 % change on previous year, measured in 2006.
The figure is down 3.5% on the previous year and up 179.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual in Réunion peaked at 32.27 % change on previous year in 1977 and was at its lowest, -30.9 % change on previous year, in 1965.
Réunion ranks 54th of 209 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual in Réunion, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 4.57 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | 8.42 % change on previous year | +84.1% |
| 1964 | -14.91 % change on previous year | -277.0% |
| 1965 | -30.9 % change on previous year | +107.3% |
| 1966 | 8.5 % change on previous year | -127.5% |
| 1967 | -1.44 % change on previous year | -117.0% |
| 1968 | 8.21 % change on previous year | -669.3% |
| 1969 | 2.47 % change on previous year | -70.0% |
| 1970 | -6.56 % change on previous year | -365.9% |
| 1971 | -8.06 % change on previous year | +22.8% |
| 1972 | 3.23 % change on previous year | -140.0% |
| 1973 | -24.59 % change on previous year | -862.3% |
| 1974 | -24.42 % change on previous year | -0.7% |
| 1975 | 0.5941 % change on previous year | -102.4% |
| 1976 | -4.15 % change on previous year | -797.9% |
| 1977 | 32.27 % change on previous year | -878.3% |
| 1978 | -5.43 % change on previous year | -116.8% |
| 1979 | -6.02 % change on previous year | +11.0% |
| 1980 | 2.73 % change on previous year | -145.3% |
| 1981 | -8.91 % change on previous year | -426.3% |
| 1982 | 5.06 % change on previous year | -156.9% |
| 1983 | 8.13 % change on previous year | +60.5% |
| 1984 | 11.86 % change on previous year | +45.9% |
| 1985 | 6.11 % change on previous year | -48.5% |
| 1986 | -3.59 % change on previous year | -158.8% |
| 1987 | 7 % change on previous year | -295.0% |
| 1988 | -6.38 % change on previous year | -191.1% |
| 1989 | 7.51 % change on previous year | -217.8% |
| 1990 | 1.2 % change on previous year | -84.0% |
| 1991 | -16.82 % change on previous year | -1501.9% |
| 1992 | 0.9901 % change on previous year | -105.9% |
| 1993 | 13.73 % change on previous year | +1286.3% |
| 1994 | -5.17 % change on previous year | -137.7% |
| 1995 | 3.64 % change on previous year | -170.3% |
| 1996 | -4.39 % change on previous year | -220.6% |
| 1997 | 32.11 % change on previous year | -832.1% |
| 1998 | 1.39 % change on previous year | -95.7% |
| 1999 | 14.38 % change on previous year | +935.6% |
| 2000 | -6.59 % change on previous year | -145.8% |
| 2001 | 8.33 % change on previous year | -226.5% |
| 2002 | 1.78 % change on previous year | -78.7% |
| 2003 | -6.4 % change on previous year | -460.3% |
| 2004 | 3.73 % change on previous year | -158.3% |
| 2005 | 3.59 % change on previous year | -3.6% |
| 2006 | 3.47 % change on previous year | -3.5% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual in Réunion changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1991 | -1501.9% | 1.2 % change on previous year | -16.82 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -1.88 % change on previous year | -30.9 % change on previous year | 8.5 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1970s | -4.31 % change on previous year | -24.59 % change on previous year | 32.27 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.95 % change on previous year | -8.91 % change on previous year | 11.86 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 4.11 % change on previous year | -16.82 % change on previous year | 32.11 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.13 % change on previous year | -6.59 % change on previous year | 8.33 % change on previous year | 7 |
Countries ranked near Réunion
- 51 China, mainland 3.51 % change on previous year compare
- 52 China 3.5 % change on previous year compare
- 53 Colombia 3.48 % change on previous year compare
- 55 Republic of Moldova 3.37 % change on previous year compare
- 56 United Arab Emirates 3.33 % change on previous year compare
- 57 Burkina Faso 3.01 % change on previous year compare
More agriculture & rural data for Réunion
- Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Yield, annual growth rate -3.38 % change on previous year (2006)
- Raw hides and skins of cattle — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual 0 % change on previous year (2006)
- Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, annual growth rate 3.61 % change on previous year (2006)
- Raw hides and skins of cattle — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth 4.55 % change on previous year (2006)
- Potatoes — Production, annual growth rate 5.14 % change on previous year (2006)
- Potatoes — Yield, annual growth rate -5.81 % change on previous year (2006)
- Potatoes — Area harvested, annual growth rate 11.63 % change on previous year (2006)
- Other vegetables, fresh n.e.c. — Production, annual growth rate 0.1596 % change on previous year (2006)
- Onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — Yield, annual -1.89 % change on previous year (2006)
- Onions and shallots, dry (excluding dehydrated) — Production, annual -6.25 % change on previous year (2006)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual in Réunion?
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual in Réunion was 3.47 % change on previous year in 2006, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual recorded in Réunion?
- The highest recorded value was 32.27 % change on previous year in 1977.
- What is the lowest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual recorded in Réunion?
- The lowest recorded value was -30.9 % change on previous year in 1965.
- How does Réunion rank for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
- Réunion ranks 54th out of 209 countries with data for 2006.
- Is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual rising or falling in Réunion?
- Over the last ten years it is up 179.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Réunion data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 45 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.