Citrus, Other — Residuals in St. Lucia
St. Lucia: Citrus, Other — Residuals was 0 1000 t in 2023. ▬ Flat
Citrus, Other — Residuals in St. Lucia, 2010–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.
Analysis
St. Lucia recorded 0 1000 t for citrus, other — residuals in 2023. That is the highest value across all 14 years on record.
Over the whole period, citrus, other — residuals in St. Lucia peaked at 0 1000 t in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 t, in 2010.
That places St. Lucia 7th out of 161 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 1000 t | 0 1000 t | 0 1000 t | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 1000 t | 0 1000 t | 0 1000 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near St. Lucia
- 4 Saudi Arabia 18 1000 t compare
- 5 Thailand 9 1000 t compare
- 6 Morocco 4 1000 t compare
- 7 Marshall Islands, Republic of the 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Bhutan 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Qatar 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Bahrain, Kingdom of 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Cuba 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Turkmenistan 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Kiribati 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Lesotho, Kingdom of 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Comoros, Union of the 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Djibouti 0 1000 t compare
- 7 São Tomé and Príncipe, Democratic Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Guinea-Bissau 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Liberia 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Mauritania, Islamic Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 7 China, Macao SAR 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Tajikistan, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Mongolia 0 1000 t compare
- 7 St. Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Solomon Islands 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Vanuatu 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Albania 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Gambia, The 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Libya 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Suriname 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Sierra Leone 0 1000 t compare
- 7 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Montenegro 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Maldives 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Armenia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Iceland 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Grenada 0 1000 t compare
- 7 French Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Seychelles 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Kuwait 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Samoa 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Estonia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Gabon 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Guyana 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Georgia 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Lithuania, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Kyrgyz Republic 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Uzbekistan, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Haiti 0 1000 t compare
- 7 New Caledonia 0 1000 t compare
- 7 North Macedonia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Guinea 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Bahamas, The 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Jordan 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Eswatini, Kingdom of 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Angola 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Papua New Guinea 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Congo, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Finland 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Oman 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Azerbaijan, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Paraguay 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Slovak Republic 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Algeria 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Uruguay 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Belarus, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Luxembourg 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Niger 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Barbados 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Latvia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Ireland 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Namibia 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Iraq 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Czech Republic 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Tunisia 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Ukraine 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Chile 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Croatia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Argentina 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Serbia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Panama 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Norway 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Burkina Faso 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Slovenia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Belize 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Jamaica 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Dominican Republic 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Belgium 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Bulgaria 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Mauritius 0 1000 t compare
- 7 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Nicaragua 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Rwanda 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Israel 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Portugal 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Romania 0 1000 t compare
- 7 El Salvador 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Poland, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Switzerland 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Denmark 0 1000 t compare
- 7 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Myanmar 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Malawi 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Yemen, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Malta 0 1000 t compare
- 7 New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Zambia 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Fiji, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Canada 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Madagascar, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Lebanon 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Austria 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Malaysia 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Russian Federation 0 1000 t compare
- 7 France 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Sweden 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Ghana 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Mozambique, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Ecuador 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Hungary 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Greece 0 1000 t compare
- 7 United Arab Emirates 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Botswana 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Australia 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Kazakhstan, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Zimbabwe 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Cyprus 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Cameroon 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Senegal 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Germany 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Italy 0 1000 t compare
- 7 South Africa 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Honduras 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Bangladesh 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Cambodia 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Costa Rica 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Nigeria 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Uganda 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Philippines 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Pakistan 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Peru 0 1000 t compare
- 7 India 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Brazil 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Mexico 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Egypt, Arab Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 7 China, mainland 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Colombia 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Australia and New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Indonesia 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Kenya 0 1000 t compare
- 7 Nepal 0 1000 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for St. Lucia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 16.57 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0166 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 244.45 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.2268 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.709 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 1.66 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 1.66 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 2.7% (2020)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.3% (2020)
Frequently asked questions
- What is citrus, other — residuals in St. Lucia?
- Citrus, other — residuals in St. Lucia was 0 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest citrus, other — residuals recorded in St. Lucia?
- The highest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2010.
- What is the lowest citrus, other — residuals recorded in St. Lucia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2010.
- How does St. Lucia rank for citrus, other — residuals?
- St. Lucia ranks 7th out of 161 countries with data for 2023.
- Where does this St. Lucia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Citrus, Other — Residuals. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.