Citrus Fruit, Total — Yield, annual growth rate in Pakistan

Pakistan: Citrus Fruit, Total — Yield, annual growth rate was 5.62 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2024)
5.62 % change on previous year
Change on year
up 199.9%
World rank
16th
of 150 countries
All-time high
741.02 % change on previous year
in 1966
All-time low
-40.39 % change on previous year
in 2007
Years of data
63
1962–2024

Citrus Fruit, Total — Yield, annual growth rate in Pakistan, 1962–2024

0200400600800196219932024

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.

Analysis

Pakistan recorded 5.62 % change on previous year for citrus fruit, total — yield, annual growth rate in 2024.

The figure is up 199.9% on the previous year and down 32.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, citrus fruit, total — yield, annual growth rate in Pakistan peaked at 741.02 % change on previous year in 1966 and was at its lowest, -40.39 % change on previous year, in 2007.

That places Pakistan 16th out of 150 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Citrus Fruit, Total — Yield, annual growth rate in Pakistan, year by year

Annual values for Citrus Fruit, Total — Yield, annual growth rate in Pakistan, 1962 to 2024.
Year % change on previous year Change
1962 -38.26 % change on previous year
1963 34.58 % change on previous year -190.4%
1964 32.04 % change on previous year -7.3%
1965 -4.85 % change on previous year -115.1%
1966 741.02 % change on previous year -15384.4%
1967 -0.3066 % change on previous year -100.0%
1968 4.24 % change on previous year -1482.2%
1969 1.91 % change on previous year -54.9%
1970 0.3827 % change on previous year -80.0%
1971 3.76 % change on previous year +883.7%
1972 5.03 % change on previous year +33.5%
1973 3.48 % change on previous year -30.7%
1974 2.27 % change on previous year -34.7%
1975 -7.06 % change on previous year -410.3%
1976 -10.16 % change on previous year +44.0%
1977 -20.76 % change on previous year +104.2%
1978 30.57 % change on previous year -247.3%
1979 -1.64 % change on previous year -105.4%
1980 1.51 % change on previous year -191.9%
1981 -3.46 % change on previous year -329.5%
1982 1.6 % change on previous year -146.1%
1983 -4.38 % change on previous year -374.3%
1984 -0.2661 % change on previous year -93.9%
1985 0.2836 % change on previous year -206.6%
1986 0.0974 % change on previous year -65.7%
1987 -7.07 % change on previous year -7354.2%
1988 3.54 % change on previous year -150.0%
1989 0.1979 % change on previous year -94.4%
1990 0.7913 % change on previous year +299.8%
1991 -0.3295 % change on previous year -141.6%
1992 2.18 % change on previous year -761.0%
1993 5.71 % change on previous year +162.2%
1994 1.38 % change on previous year -75.8%
1995 -0.0809 % change on previous year -105.9%
1996 1.7 % change on previous year -2198.0%
1997 0.8652 % change on previous year -49.0%
1998 -9.03 % change on previous year -1144.2%
1999 4.01 % change on previous year -144.4%
2000 -2.81 % change on previous year -170.1%
2001 -1.4 % change on previous year -50.3%
2002 -0.4937 % change on previous year -64.7%
2003 6.18 % change on previous year -1352.4%
2004 6.01 % change on previous year -2.7%
2005 20.93 % change on previous year +248.0%
2006 0.2203 % change on previous year -98.9%
2007 -40.39 % change on previous year -18439.3%
2008 50.93 % change on previous year -226.1%
2009 -7.3 % change on previous year -114.3%
2010 1.63 % change on previous year -122.3%
2011 -5.96 % change on previous year -466.0%
2012 8.63 % change on previous year -244.9%
2013 -6.62 % change on previous year -176.7%
2014 8.37 % change on previous year -226.5%
2015 1.2 % change on previous year -85.7%
2016 7.56 % change on previous year +530.8%
2017 -4.35 % change on previous year -157.6%
2018 9.66 % change on previous year -321.9%
2019 6.92 % change on previous year -28.3%
2020 10.68 % change on previous year +54.3%
2021 10.57 % change on previous year -1.1%
2022 -9.59 % change on previous year -190.7%
2023 -5.62 % change on previous year -41.4%
2024 5.62 % change on previous year -199.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 96.3 % change on previous year -38.26 % change on previous year 741.02 % change on previous year 8
1970s 0.5885 % change on previous year -20.76 % change on previous year 30.57 % change on previous year 10
1980s -0.7956 % change on previous year -7.07 % change on previous year 3.54 % change on previous year 10
1990s 0.719 % change on previous year -9.03 % change on previous year 5.71 % change on previous year 10
2000s 3.19 % change on previous year -40.39 % change on previous year 50.93 % change on previous year 10
2010s 2.7 % change on previous year -6.62 % change on previous year 9.66 % change on previous year 10
2020s 2.33 % change on previous year -9.59 % change on previous year 10.68 % change on previous year 5

Countries ranked near Pakistan

  1. 13 Belize 7.16 % change on previous year compare
  2. 14 Guyana 6.22 % change on previous year compare
  3. 15 Yugoslav SFR 6.02 % change on previous year compare
  4. 17 Angola 5.05 % change on previous year compare
  5. 18 Tunisia 5.02 % change on previous year compare
  6. 19 Russian Federation 4.85 % change on previous year compare

See the full ranking of 180 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Pakistan

All data for Pakistan →

Frequently asked questions

What is citrus fruit, total — yield, annual growth rate in Pakistan?
Citrus fruit, total — yield, annual growth rate in Pakistan was 5.62 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest citrus fruit, total — yield, annual growth rate recorded in Pakistan?
The highest recorded value was 741.02 % change on previous year in 1966.
What is the lowest citrus fruit, total — yield, annual growth rate recorded in Pakistan?
The lowest recorded value was -40.39 % change on previous year in 2007.
How does Pakistan rank for citrus fruit, total — yield, annual growth rate?
Pakistan ranks 16th out of 150 countries with data for 2024.
Is citrus fruit, total — yield, annual growth rate rising or falling in Pakistan?
Over the last ten years it is down 32.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Pakistan data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Citrus Fruit, Total — Yield, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Citrus Fruit, Total — Yield, annual growth rate in Pakistan. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/citrus-fruit-total-yield-annual-growth-rate/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/citrus-fruit-total-yield-annual-growth-rate/pakistan/">Citrus Fruit, Total — Yield, annual growth rate in Pakistan</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

The year-on-year percentage change in Citrus Fruit, Total — Yield. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Citrus Fruit, Total — Yield, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 9,495 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Citrus Fruit, Total — Yield. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.