Citrus Fruit, Total — Production, per square kilometre in Uruguay
Uruguay: Citrus Fruit, Total — Production, per square kilometre was 1.33 t per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Citrus Fruit, Total — Production, per square kilometre in Uruguay, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, citrus fruit, total — production, per square kilometre in Uruguay stood at 1.33 t per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 17.0% on the previous year and down 0.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, citrus fruit, total — production, per square kilometre in Uruguay peaked at 2.05 t per square kilometre in 1998 and was at its lowest, 0.3686 t per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Uruguay 47th out of 138 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Citrus Fruit, Total — Production, per square kilometre in Uruguay, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.3686 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.3731 t per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1963 | 0.3794 t per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1964 | 0.3982 t per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1965 | 0.3714 t per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 1966 | 0.43 t per square kilometre | +15.8% |
| 1967 | 0.4551 t per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1968 | 0.47 t per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1969 | 0.4777 t per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1970 | 0.4931 t per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1971 | 0.4931 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.4908 t per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1973 | 0.4914 t per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 1974 | 0.4674 t per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 1975 | 0.4708 t per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1976 | 0.4742 t per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1977 | 0.5057 t per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 1978 | 0.44 t per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 1979 | 0.5314 t per square kilometre | +20.8% |
| 1980 | 0.6689 t per square kilometre | +25.9% |
| 1981 | 0.6581 t per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1982 | 0.7662 t per square kilometre | +16.4% |
| 1983 | 0.7085 t per square kilometre | -7.5% |
| 1984 | 0.8605 t per square kilometre | +21.5% |
| 1985 | 0.901 t per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1986 | 1.03 t per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 1987 | 1.05 t per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1988 | 1.05 t per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 1989 | 0.8799 t per square kilometre | -16.5% |
| 1990 | 1.18 t per square kilometre | +34.0% |
| 1991 | 1.29 t per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 1992 | 1.49 t per square kilometre | +14.8% |
| 1993 | 1.41 t per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 1994 | 1.43 t per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1995 | 1.32 t per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 1996 | 1.55 t per square kilometre | +17.7% |
| 1997 | 1.81 t per square kilometre | +17.0% |
| 1998 | 2.05 t per square kilometre | +13.1% |
| 1999 | 1.71 t per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 2000 | 1.24 t per square kilometre | -27.5% |
| 2001 | 1.96 t per square kilometre | +58.0% |
| 2002 | 1.35 t per square kilometre | -31.2% |
| 2003 | 1.42 t per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 2004 | 1.38 t per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 2005 | 1.86 t per square kilometre | +34.6% |
| 2006 | 1.59 t per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 2007 | 1.98 t per square kilometre | +24.8% |
| 2008 | 1.45 t per square kilometre | -26.8% |
| 2009 | 1.53 t per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2010 | 1.8 t per square kilometre | +17.3% |
| 2011 | 1.54 t per square kilometre | -14.2% |
| 2012 | 1.88 t per square kilometre | +21.9% |
| 2013 | 1.34 t per square kilometre | -28.8% |
| 2014 | 1.64 t per square kilometre | +22.4% |
| 2015 | 1.44 t per square kilometre | -12.3% |
| 2016 | 1.55 t per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 2017 | 1.51 t per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 2018 | 1.24 t per square kilometre | -17.9% |
| 2019 | 1.39 t per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 2020 | 1.25 t per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 2021 | 1.71 t per square kilometre | +36.8% |
| 2022 | 1.61 t per square kilometre | -6.0% |
| 2023 | 1.33 t per square kilometre | -17.0% |
Uruguay compared with similar countries
- Uruguay's 1.33 t per square kilometre is above the median for high income countries, which is 0.106 t per square kilometre, 12.6× the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Uruguay's 1.33 t per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1.56 t per square kilometre, 86% of the median. (30 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.4137 t per square kilometre | 0.3686 t per square kilometre | 0.4777 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.4858 t per square kilometre | 0.44 t per square kilometre | 0.5314 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.8575 t per square kilometre | 0.6581 t per square kilometre | 1.05 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.52 t per square kilometre | 1.18 t per square kilometre | 2.05 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.58 t per square kilometre | 1.24 t per square kilometre | 1.98 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.53 t per square kilometre | 1.24 t per square kilometre | 1.88 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.47 t per square kilometre | 1.25 t per square kilometre | 1.71 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Uruguay
More agriculture & rural data for Uruguay
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 3.67 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0638 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,609 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.32 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.0435 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.4% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.4% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 14.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is citrus fruit, total — production, per square kilometre in Uruguay?
- Citrus fruit, total — production, per square kilometre in Uruguay was 1.33 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest citrus fruit, total — production, per square kilometre recorded in Uruguay?
- The highest recorded value was 2.05 t per square kilometre in 1998.
- What is the lowest citrus fruit, total — production, per square kilometre recorded in Uruguay?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.3686 t per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Uruguay rank for citrus fruit, total — production, per square kilometre?
- Uruguay ranks 47th out of 138 countries with data for 2023.
- Is citrus fruit, total — production, per square kilometre rising or falling in Uruguay?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Uruguay data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Citrus Fruit, Total — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Citrus Fruit, Total — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Citrus Fruit, Total — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Citrus Fruit, Total — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Citrus Fruit, Total — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.