Citrus Fruit, Total — Production, annual growth rate in Viet Nam
Viet Nam: Citrus Fruit, Total — Production, annual growth rate was 3.76 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Citrus Fruit, Total — Production, annual growth rate in Viet Nam, 1962–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for citrus fruit, total — production, annual growth rate in Viet Nam is 3.76 % change on previous year, measured in 2024.
The figure is up 6.9% on the previous year and down 56.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, citrus fruit, total — production, annual growth rate in Viet Nam peaked at 39.16 % change on previous year in 1993 and was at its lowest, -15.96 % change on previous year, in 2001.
Viet Nam ranks 32nd of 150 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Citrus Fruit, Total — Production, annual growth rate in Viet Nam, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 10.64 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | 13.46 % change on previous year | +26.5% |
| 1964 | 6.78 % change on previous year | -49.6% |
| 1965 | 7.94 % change on previous year | +17.1% |
| 1966 | 10.29 % change on previous year | +29.7% |
| 1967 | 9.33 % change on previous year | -9.3% |
| 1968 | 2.44 % change on previous year | -73.9% |
| 1969 | 4.76 % change on previous year | +95.2% |
| 1970 | 5.68 % change on previous year | +19.3% |
| 1971 | 8.6 % change on previous year | +51.4% |
| 1972 | 2.97 % change on previous year | -65.5% |
| 1973 | 2.88 % change on previous year | -2.9% |
| 1974 | 2.8 % change on previous year | -2.8% |
| 1975 | -4.55 % change on previous year | -262.1% |
| 1976 | 4.76 % change on previous year | -204.8% |
| 1977 | 2.73 % change on previous year | -42.7% |
| 1978 | 7.35 % change on previous year | +169.3% |
| 1979 | -4.37 % change on previous year | -159.5% |
| 1980 | -2.33 % change on previous year | -46.7% |
| 1981 | -6.18 % change on previous year | +165.4% |
| 1982 | 32.64 % change on previous year | -628.4% |
| 1983 | 12.77 % change on previous year | -60.9% |
| 1984 | -4.4 % change on previous year | -134.5% |
| 1985 | 3.46 % change on previous year | -178.7% |
| 1986 | 3.01 % change on previous year | -13.1% |
| 1987 | 5.56 % change on previous year | +84.5% |
| 1988 | 2.34 % change on previous year | -57.9% |
| 1989 | 0.5703 % change on previous year | -75.6% |
| 1990 | 13.2 % change on previous year | +2215.5% |
| 1991 | 3.44 % change on previous year | -73.9% |
| 1992 | 18.45 % change on previous year | +436.1% |
| 1993 | 39.16 % change on previous year | +112.3% |
| 1994 | 12.04 % change on previous year | -69.2% |
| 1995 | 25.96 % change on previous year | +115.5% |
| 1996 | 13.72 % change on previous year | -47.1% |
| 1997 | -5.85 % change on previous year | -142.6% |
| 1998 | -2.3 % change on previous year | -60.7% |
| 1999 | -3.42 % change on previous year | +48.9% |
| 2000 | 34.56 % change on previous year | -1109.4% |
| 2001 | -15.96 % change on previous year | -146.2% |
| 2002 | 18.73 % change on previous year | -217.4% |
| 2003 | 8.77 % change on previous year | -53.2% |
| 2004 | 7.8 % change on previous year | -11.0% |
| 2005 | 8.37 % change on previous year | +7.2% |
| 2006 | 3.23 % change on previous year | -61.4% |
| 2007 | 16.61 % change on previous year | +414.1% |
| 2008 | 4.41 % change on previous year | -73.4% |
| 2009 | 3.5 % change on previous year | -20.7% |
| 2010 | 5.08 % change on previous year | +45.0% |
| 2011 | -15.4 % change on previous year | -403.3% |
| 2012 | 0.2782 % change on previous year | -101.8% |
| 2013 | 1.39 % change on previous year | +398.0% |
| 2014 | 8.71 % change on previous year | +528.4% |
| 2015 | -1.77 % change on previous year | -120.3% |
| 2016 | 9.32 % change on previous year | -627.6% |
| 2017 | 17.85 % change on previous year | +91.5% |
| 2018 | 13.17 % change on previous year | -26.2% |
| 2019 | 21.38 % change on previous year | +62.3% |
| 2020 | 13.98 % change on previous year | -34.6% |
| 2021 | 25.37 % change on previous year | +81.5% |
| 2022 | 11.41 % change on previous year | -55.0% |
| 2023 | 3.52 % change on previous year | -69.1% |
| 2024 | 3.76 % change on previous year | +6.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.21 % change on previous year | 2.44 % change on previous year | 13.46 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1970s | 2.89 % change on previous year | -4.55 % change on previous year | 8.6 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 4.74 % change on previous year | -6.18 % change on previous year | 32.64 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 11.44 % change on previous year | -5.85 % change on previous year | 39.16 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 9 % change on previous year | -15.96 % change on previous year | 34.56 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 6 % change on previous year | -15.4 % change on previous year | 21.38 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 11.61 % change on previous year | 3.52 % change on previous year | 25.37 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Viet Nam
More agriculture & rural data for Viet Nam
- Sheep and Goat Meat — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth 4.32 % change on previous year (2024)
- Vegetables Primary — Yield, annual growth rate 0.7029 % change on previous year (2024)
- Vegetables Primary — Area harvested, annual growth rate -0.3987 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sugar Crops Primary — Production, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sugar Crops Primary — Yield, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sheep and Goats — Stocks, annual growth rate 3.52 % change on previous year (2024)
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Production, annual growth rate 1.43 % change on previous year (2024)
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate 0.9797 % change on previous year (2024)
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Yield, annual growth rate 0.4418 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is citrus fruit, total — production, annual growth rate in Viet Nam?
- Citrus fruit, total — production, annual growth rate in Viet Nam was 3.76 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest citrus fruit, total — production, annual growth rate recorded in Viet Nam?
- The highest recorded value was 39.16 % change on previous year in 1993.
- What is the lowest citrus fruit, total — production, annual growth rate recorded in Viet Nam?
- The lowest recorded value was -15.96 % change on previous year in 2001.
- How does Viet Nam rank for citrus fruit, total — production, annual growth rate?
- Viet Nam ranks 32nd out of 150 countries with data for 2024.
- Is citrus fruit, total — production, annual growth rate rising or falling in Viet Nam?
- Over the last ten years it is down 56.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Viet Nam data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Citrus Fruit, Total — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Citrus Fruit, Total — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Citrus Fruit, Total — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Citrus Fruit, Total — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.