Chillies and peppers, green (Capsicum spp. and Pimenta spp.) — Yield in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Chillies and peppers, green (Capsicum spp. and Pimenta spp.) — Yield was 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Chillies and peppers, green (Capsicum spp. and Pimenta spp.) — Yield in Zimbabwe, 1991–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in kg/ha per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Zimbabwe recorded 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP for chillies and peppers, green (capsicum spp. and pimenta spp.) — yield in 2024.
The figure is down 13.6% on the previous year and down 53.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, chillies and peppers, green (capsicum spp. and pimenta spp.) — yield in Zimbabwe peaked at 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP, in 2017.
Zimbabwe ranks 57th of 111 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Chillies and peppers, green (Capsicum spp. and Pimenta spp.) — Yield in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | kg/ha per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1991 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1992 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +31.9% |
| 1993 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +3.8% |
| 1994 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -5.1% |
| 1995 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -3.1% |
| 1996 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -16.9% |
| 1997 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +0.3% |
| 1998 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +33.2% |
| 1999 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -6.6% |
| 2000 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +2.5% |
| 2001 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -1.3% |
| 2002 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +6.9% |
| 2003 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +10.7% |
| 2004 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -1.3% |
| 2005 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +0.9% |
| 2006 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +5.7% |
| 2007 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +2.9% |
| 2008 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +19.8% |
| 2009 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -54.3% |
| 2010 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -19.7% |
| 2011 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -14.6% |
| 2012 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -17.6% |
| 2013 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -10.3% |
| 2014 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -2.0% |
| 2015 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -2.3% |
| 2016 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -2.8% |
| 2017 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -59.7% |
| 2018 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +49.5% |
| 2019 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +2.5% |
| 2020 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +4.3% |
| 2021 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -22.6% |
| 2022 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +1.3% |
| 2023 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +13.6% |
| 2024 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -13.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 2000s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
More agriculture & rural data for Zimbabwe
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 34.41 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0947 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 286.19 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.8815 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.595 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 9.5% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 9.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.3% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is chillies and peppers, green (capsicum spp. and pimenta spp.) — yield in Zimbabwe?
- Chillies and peppers, green (capsicum spp. and pimenta spp.) — yield in Zimbabwe was 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest chillies and peppers, green (capsicum spp. and pimenta spp.) — yield recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in 2008.
- What is the lowest chillies and peppers, green (capsicum spp. and pimenta spp.) — yield recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in 2017.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for chillies and peppers, green (capsicum spp. and pimenta spp.) — yield?
- Zimbabwe ranks 57th out of 111 countries with data for 2024.
- Is chillies and peppers, green (capsicum spp. and pimenta spp.) — yield rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is down 53.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Chillies and peppers, green (Capsicum spp. and Pimenta spp.) — Yield, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 34 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Chillies and peppers, green (Capsicum spp. and Pimenta spp.) — Yield divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Chillies and peppers, green (Capsicum spp. and Pimenta spp.) — Yield ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Chillies and peppers, green (Capsicum spp. and Pimenta spp.) — Yield Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Chillies and peppers, green (Capsicum spp. and Pimenta spp.) — Yield divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.