Cabbages — Area harvested, per unit of GDP in Malta
Malta: Cabbages — Area harvested, per unit of GDP was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2017. ◆ Volatile
Cabbages — Area harvested, per unit of GDP in Malta, 1970–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Malta recorded 0 ha per US$ of GDP for cabbages — area harvested, per unit of gdp in 2017. That is the lowest value across all 48 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 22.5% on the previous year and down 30.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cabbages — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Malta peaked at 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 1970 and was at its lowest, 0 ha per US$ of GDP, in 2017.
Malta ranks 53rd of 129 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cabbages — Area harvested, per unit of GDP in Malta, year by year
| Year | ha per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1971 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -12.1% |
| 1972 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -11.5% |
| 1973 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -19.1% |
| 1974 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +0.8% |
| 1975 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -21.8% |
| 1976 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +3.7% |
| 1977 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -10.9% |
| 1978 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -29.5% |
| 1979 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -24.5% |
| 1980 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -12.0% |
| 1981 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -9.6% |
| 1982 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -5.6% |
| 1983 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +18.6% |
| 1984 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +23.4% |
| 1985 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -3.4% |
| 1986 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -22.9% |
| 1987 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -18.1% |
| 1988 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -11.5% |
| 1989 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -1.7% |
| 1990 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -21.0% |
| 1991 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -13.2% |
| 1992 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -10.0% |
| 1993 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +14.1% |
| 1994 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -29.7% |
| 1995 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -19.2% |
| 1996 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +38.6% |
| 1997 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +122.1% |
| 1998 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -3.0% |
| 1999 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +7.9% |
| 2000 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -2.2% |
| 2001 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -17.4% |
| 2002 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -11.8% |
| 2003 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -20.3% |
| 2004 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +13.9% |
| 2005 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -12.5% |
| 2006 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -5.3% |
| 2007 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -18.5% |
| 2008 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -9.7% |
| 2009 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -0.2% |
| 2010 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +2.4% |
| 2011 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +2.5% |
| 2012 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +0.6% |
| 2013 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +3.3% |
| 2014 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -2.7% |
| 2015 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +0.3% |
| 2016 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -6.0% |
| 2017 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -22.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 8 |
Countries ranked near Malta
More agriculture & rural data for Malta
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 6.05 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0047 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 224.75 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 1.3 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.0432 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 0.5% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 0.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.1% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.2% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cabbages — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Malta?
- Cabbages — area harvested, per unit of gdp in Malta was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest cabbages — area harvested, per unit of gdp recorded in Malta?
- The highest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 1970.
- What is the lowest cabbages — area harvested, per unit of gdp recorded in Malta?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2017.
- How does Malta rank for cabbages — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Malta ranks 53rd out of 129 countries with data for 2017.
- Is cabbages — area harvested, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Malta?
- Over the last ten years it is down 30.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Malta data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Cabbages — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 48 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Cabbages — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Cabbages — Area harvested ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Cabbages — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Cabbages — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.