Cabbages — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Chile
Chile: Cabbages — Area harvested, per square kilometre was 0.0036 ha per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Cabbages — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Chile, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per square kilometre.
Analysis
Chile recorded 0.0036 ha per square kilometre for cabbages — area harvested, per square kilometre in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 9.0% on the previous year and up 57.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cabbages — area harvested, per square kilometre in Chile peaked at 0.0039 ha per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, 0.0013 ha per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Chile 99th out of 129 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Cabbages — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Chile, year by year
| Year | ha per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0013 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0013 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0013 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.0013 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.0014 ha per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1966 | 0.0015 ha per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1967 | 0.0015 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.0016 ha per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1969 | 0.0015 ha per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 1970 | 0.0015 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.0013 ha per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 1972 | 0.0016 ha per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 1973 | 0.0017 ha per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1974 | 0.0019 ha per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1975 | 0.002 ha per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1976 | 0.0023 ha per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 1977 | 0.0022 ha per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 1978 | 0.002 ha per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 1979 | 0.002 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.002 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.0019 ha per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 1982 | 0.0019 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.0015 ha per square kilometre | -21.4% |
| 1984 | 0.0015 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.0013 ha per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 1986 | 0.0014 ha per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1987 | 0.0021 ha per square kilometre | +55.4% |
| 1988 | 0.0021 ha per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 1989 | 0.0028 ha per square kilometre | +35.4% |
| 1990 | 0.0028 ha per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1991 | 0.0026 ha per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 1992 | 0.0028 ha per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1993 | 0.0031 ha per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 1994 | 0.0037 ha per square kilometre | +18.1% |
| 1995 | 0.0038 ha per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1996 | 0.0035 ha per square kilometre | -6.8% |
| 1997 | 0.0025 ha per square kilometre | -29.6% |
| 1998 | 0.0032 ha per square kilometre | +28.5% |
| 1999 | 0.003 ha per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 2000 | 0.003 ha per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2001 | 0.003 ha per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2002 | 0.003 ha per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 2003 | 0.003 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.003 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.003 ha per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2006 | 0.0031 ha per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2007 | 0.0021 ha per square kilometre | -33.1% |
| 2008 | 0.0022 ha per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2009 | 0.0023 ha per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2010 | 0.0024 ha per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2011 | 0.002 ha per square kilometre | -15.3% |
| 2012 | 0.0024 ha per square kilometre | +22.1% |
| 2013 | 0.0023 ha per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 2014 | 0.0023 ha per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2015 | 0.0022 ha per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 2016 | 0.0023 ha per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 2017 | 0.0027 ha per square kilometre | +18.1% |
| 2018 | 0.003 ha per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 2019 | 0.003 ha per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2020 | 0.0032 ha per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2021 | 0.003 ha per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 2022 | 0.0039 ha per square kilometre | +29.3% |
| 2023 | 0.0036 ha per square kilometre | -9.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0014 ha per square kilometre | 0.0013 ha per square kilometre | 0.0016 ha per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0019 ha per square kilometre | 0.0013 ha per square kilometre | 0.0023 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0018 ha per square kilometre | 0.0013 ha per square kilometre | 0.0028 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0031 ha per square kilometre | 0.0025 ha per square kilometre | 0.0038 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0028 ha per square kilometre | 0.0021 ha per square kilometre | 0.0031 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0025 ha per square kilometre | 0.002 ha per square kilometre | 0.003 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0034 ha per square kilometre | 0.003 ha per square kilometre | 0.0039 ha per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 96 Nepal 0.0038 ha per square kilometre compare
- 97 Norway 0.0038 ha per square kilometre compare
- 98 Oman 0.0037 ha per square kilometre compare
- 100 South Africa 0.0029 ha per square kilometre compare
- 101 New Zealand 0.0029 ha per square kilometre compare
- 102 Belize 0.0027 ha per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Chile
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -2.03 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0345 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 621.34 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.18 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1082 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 3.5% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 3.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 4.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cabbages — area harvested, per square kilometre in Chile?
- Cabbages — area harvested, per square kilometre in Chile was 0.0036 ha per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest cabbages — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0039 ha per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest cabbages — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0013 ha per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Chile rank for cabbages — area harvested, per square kilometre?
- Chile ranks 99th out of 129 countries with data for 2023.
- Is cabbages — area harvested, per square kilometre rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is up 57.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Cabbages — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Cabbages — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Cabbages — Area harvested ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Cabbages — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Cabbages — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.