Statizoid

Barley and products β€” Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Barley and products β€” Residuals was 594 1000 t in 2023. β—† Volatile

Latest (2023)
594 1000 t
Change on year
down 58.5%
Rank
2nd
of 31 groups
All-time high
1,432 1000 t
in 2022
All-time low
-87 1000 t
in 2014
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Barley and products β€” Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), 2010–2023

05001.0k1.5k2010201620232010: 106 1000 t2011: 862 1000 t2012: 88 1000 t2013: 1.2k 1000 t2014: -87 1000 t2015: -5 1000 t2016: -20 1000 t2017: 4 1000 t2018: 457 1000 t2019: 825 1000 t2020: 566 1000 t2021: 486 1000 t2022: 1.4k 1000 t2023: 594 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

The most recent figure for barley and products β€” residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) is 594 1000 t, measured in 2023.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 58.5% on the previous year and down 49.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, barley and products β€” residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) peaked at 1,432 1000 t in 2022 and was at its lowest, -87 1000 t, in 2014.

That places Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) 2nd out of 31 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 340.5 1000 t -87 1000 t 1,175 1000 t 10
2020s 769.5 1000 t 486 1000 t 1,432 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

  1. 1 Kazakhstan 604 1000 t compare
  2. 2 Hungary 71 1000 t compare
  3. 3 Lao People's Democratic Republic 5 1000 t compare
  4. 4 Pakistan 2 1000 t compare
  5. 5 Bahrain 0 1000 t compare
  6. 5 Nauru 0 1000 t compare
  7. 5 Bhutan 0 1000 t compare
  8. 5 Marshall Islands 0 1000 t compare
  9. 5 Tuvalu 0 1000 t compare
  10. 5 Tonga 0 1000 t compare
  11. 5 Qatar 0 1000 t compare
  12. 5 Democratic People's Republic of Korea 0 1000 t compare
  13. 5 Cuba 0 1000 t compare
  14. 5 China, Macao SAR 0 1000 t compare
  15. 5 Kiribati 0 1000 t compare
  16. 5 Djibouti 0 1000 t compare
  17. 5 Comoros 0 1000 t compare
  18. 5 Guinea-Bissau 0 1000 t compare
  19. 5 Bahamas 0 1000 t compare
  20. 5 Gabon 0 1000 t compare
  21. 5 Barbados 0 1000 t compare
  22. 5 Maldives 0 1000 t compare
  23. 5 Cabo Verde 0 1000 t compare
  24. 5 Sao Tome and Principe 0 1000 t compare
  25. 5 Angola 0 1000 t compare
  26. 5 Afghanistan 0 1000 t compare
  27. 5 Gambia 0 1000 t compare
  28. 5 Haiti 0 1000 t compare
  29. 5 Congo 0 1000 t compare
  30. 5 Burkina Faso 0 1000 t compare
  31. 5 Guinea 0 1000 t compare
  32. 5 CΓ΄te d'Ivoire 0 1000 t compare
  33. 5 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 t compare
  34. 5 Grenada 0 1000 t compare
  35. 5 Timor-Leste 0 1000 t compare
  36. 5 Liberia 0 1000 t compare
  37. 5 French Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
  38. 5 Samoa 0 1000 t compare
  39. 5 Botswana 0 1000 t compare
  40. 5 Albania 0 1000 t compare
  41. 5 Belize 0 1000 t compare
  42. 5 El Salvador 0 1000 t compare
  43. 5 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 1000 t compare
  44. 5 Kuwait 0 1000 t compare
  45. 5 Ghana 0 1000 t compare
  46. 5 Cameroon 0 1000 t compare
  47. 5 Algeria 0 1000 t compare
  48. 5 Cambodia 0 1000 t compare
  49. 5 Belarus 0 1000 t compare
  50. 5 Democratic Republic of the Congo 0 1000 t compare
  51. 5 Seychelles 0 1000 t compare
  52. 5 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t compare
  53. 5 Austria 0 1000 t compare
  54. 5 Iceland 0 1000 t compare
  55. 5 Vanuatu 0 1000 t compare
  56. 5 Lesotho 0 1000 t compare
  57. 5 Guyana 0 1000 t compare
  58. 5 Canada 0 1000 t compare
  59. 5 Fiji 0 1000 t compare
  60. 5 Saint Lucia 0 1000 t compare
  61. 5 Eswatini 0 1000 t compare
  62. 5 Micronesia 0 1000 t compare
  63. 5 Papua New Guinea 0 1000 t compare
  64. 5 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 0 1000 t compare
  65. 5 Mauritania 0 1000 t compare
  66. 5 Libya 0 1000 t compare
  67. 5 Nicaragua 0 1000 t compare
  68. 5 Bangladesh 0 1000 t compare
  69. 5 Namibia 0 1000 t compare
  70. 5 Costa Rica 0 1000 t compare
  71. 5 Dominican Republic 0 1000 t compare
  72. 5 Australia 0 1000 t compare
  73. 5 Indonesia 0 1000 t compare
  74. 5 Brazil 0 1000 t compare
  75. 5 Georgia 0 1000 t compare
  76. 5 Argentina 0 1000 t compare
  77. 5 Lebanon 0 1000 t compare
  78. 5 Finland 0 1000 t compare
  79. 5 Azerbaijan 0 1000 t compare
  80. 5 Denmark 0 1000 t compare
  81. 5 Malaysia 0 1000 t compare
  82. 5 Malawi 0 1000 t compare
  83. 5 Jordan 0 1000 t compare
  84. 5 Israel 0 1000 t compare
  85. 5 Paraguay 0 1000 t compare
  86. 5 Estonia 0 1000 t compare
  87. 5 Montenegro 0 1000 t compare
  88. 5 Bulgaria 0 1000 t compare
  89. 5 Jamaica 0 1000 t compare
  90. 5 Panama 0 1000 t compare
  91. 5 Ethiopia 0 1000 t compare
  92. 5 Madagascar 0 1000 t compare
  93. 5 New Caledonia 0 1000 t compare
  94. 5 Solomon Islands 0 1000 t compare
  95. 5 Sierra Leone 0 1000 t compare
  96. 5 Iraq 0 1000 t compare
  97. 5 Suriname 0 1000 t compare
  98. 5 Chile 0 1000 t compare
  99. 5 Mauritius 0 1000 t compare
  100. 5 Cyprus 0 1000 t compare
  101. 5 Mozambique 0 1000 t compare
  102. 5 Nigeria 0 1000 t compare
  103. 5 Honduras 0 1000 t compare
  104. 5 Oman 0 1000 t compare
  105. 5 China, mainland 0 1000 t compare
  106. 5 Colombia 0 1000 t compare
  107. 5 Germany 0 1000 t compare
  108. 5 Ecuador 0 1000 t compare
  109. 5 Norway 0 1000 t compare
  110. 5 Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  111. 5 Latvia 0 1000 t compare
  112. 5 India 0 1000 t compare
  113. 5 Myanmar 0 1000 t compare
  114. 5 Sri Lanka 0 1000 t compare
  115. 5 Turkmenistan 0 1000 t compare
  116. 5 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 t compare
  117. 5 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 0 1000 t compare
  118. 5 Republic of Moldova 0 1000 t compare
  119. 5 Tunisia 0 1000 t compare
  120. 5 Senegal 0 1000 t compare
  121. 5 France 0 1000 t compare
  122. 5 Rwanda 0 1000 t compare
  123. 5 Yemen 0 1000 t compare
  124. 5 Malta 0 1000 t compare
  125. 5 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 1000 t compare
  126. 5 Slovakia 0 1000 t compare
  127. 5 Serbia 0 1000 t compare
  128. 5 United Arab Emirates 0 1000 t compare
  129. 5 Kyrgyzstan 0 1000 t compare
  130. 5 Saudi Arabia 0 1000 t compare
  131. 5 Morocco 0 1000 t compare
  132. 5 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 0 1000 t compare
  133. 5 Egypt 0 1000 t compare
  134. 5 Syrian Arab Republic 0 1000 t compare
  135. 5 Mexico 0 1000 t compare
  136. 5 Guatemala 0 1000 t compare
  137. 5 North Macedonia 0 1000 t compare
  138. 5 Italy 0 1000 t compare
  139. 5 Switzerland 0 1000 t compare
  140. 5 Poland 0 1000 t compare
  141. 5 New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  142. 5 Slovenia 0 1000 t compare
  143. 5 Tajikistan 0 1000 t compare
  144. 5 Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
  145. 5 Uganda 0 1000 t compare
  146. 5 Portugal 0 1000 t compare
  147. 5 Sweden 0 1000 t compare
  148. 5 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t compare
  149. 5 Peru 0 1000 t compare
  150. 5 Uruguay 0 1000 t compare
  151. 5 Republic of Korea 0 1000 t compare
  152. 5 Thailand 0 1000 t compare
  153. 5 Zimbabwe 0 1000 t compare
  154. 5 Russian Federation 0 1000 t compare
  155. 5 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  156. 5 Uzbekistan 0 1000 t compare
  157. 5 Zambia 0 1000 t compare
  158. 5 Nepal 0 1000 t compare
  159. 5 TΓΌrkiye 0 1000 t compare
  160. 5 Spain 0 1000 t compare
  161. 5 Ukraine 0 1000 t compare
  162. 5 Melanesia 0 1000 t compare
  163. 5 Australia and New Zealand 0 1000 t compare

See the full ranking of 212 places β†’

More agriculture & rural data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

All data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is barley and products β€” residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Barley and products β€” residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) was 594 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest barley and products β€” residuals recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The highest recorded value was 1,432 1000 t in 2022.
What is the lowest barley and products β€” residuals recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The lowest recorded value was -87 1000 t in 2014.
How does Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank for barley and products β€” residuals?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 2nd out of 31 groups with data for 2023.
Is barley and products β€” residuals rising or falling in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Over the last ten years it is down 49.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Barley and products β€” Residuals. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barley and products β€” Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/barley-and-products-residuals/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/barley-and-products-residuals/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Barley and products β€” Residuals in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Barley and products β€” Residuals
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
212 places, 2,892 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.